All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [URGENT PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_evict_inode()
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:58:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgt=MBAGurdr6Cce9zZ5sWX=BQz4RXJ4HHVWuUvM+gPcgpkFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110826155234.GC5176@thunk.org>

Hi Ted,

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:27:39PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>> No, it doesn't mean the ext4_truncate. But another race pasted below.
>>
>> Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to
>> prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while
>> some process is writing inode A. During page fault,
>> shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode
>> B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
>> that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode
>> B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
>> same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten
>> thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
>> grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
>> still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.
>
> ... but that shouldn't be a problem since we're not holding A's
> i_mutex at this point, right?  Or am I missing something?
I think it is possible that we are holding A's i_mutex lock if the page
fault happens while we are writing inode A. The problem is if we call
ext4_evict_inode for inode B during the page fault handling and we
just call ext4_ioend_wait() to wait for inode B's i_ioend_count to
become zero, we rely on the ext4-dio-unwritten worker thread to
finish any queued work at some time. But as mentioned in the change
commit log, B's io_end work may be queued after A's work on the
same cpu. Since A's i_mutex lock may be still hold during the page
fault time, the ext4-dio-unwritten worker thread can't make progress.

Now thinking about an alternative approach to resolve the deadlock
mentioned above, maybe we can use mutex_trylock() in
ext4_end_io_work() and if we can't grab the mutex lock for an inode,
just requeue the work to the end of workqueue?

Jiaying
>
>                                       - Ted
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-26 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-26  3:33 [URGENT PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_evict_inode() Theodore Ts'o
2011-08-26  3:56 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26  9:28   ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26  7:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-26  7:42   ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26  8:44   ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-26  8:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-26  9:10       ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26  9:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-26 11:35           ` Theodore Tso
2011-08-26 14:53             ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26  9:03     ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26  9:24       ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-26  9:27         ` Tao Ma
2011-08-26 15:52           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-08-26 16:58             ` Jiaying Zhang [this message]
2011-08-26 20:22               ` Ted Ts'o
2011-08-27  5:17                 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-31  1:15                   ` Jiaying Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFgt=MBAGurdr6Cce9zZ5sWX=BQz4RXJ4HHVWuUvM+gPcgpkFg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jiayingz@google.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.