From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754539AbaIXKSz (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:18:55 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:33195 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753854AbaIXKSw (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:18:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <13000968.l0laEvMsix@wuerfel> References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <1410168160-3624-2-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <13000968.l0laEvMsix@wuerfel> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:18:50 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PcXxK_JsHIw9CAje_2ntyTt2qJY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP From: Ley Foon Tan To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:20:08 LF.Tan wrote: >> Hi Arnd >> >> Are you okay with this generic futex in asm-generic? >> > > Yes, this looks good. Remind me again who need this, would it make > sense to merge this through an architecture-specific tree for > whichever architecture can benefit from it? What is the common practice for this? Do you mean merge with nios2 or other arch, eg m68k? Ley Foon