From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029A2C433ED for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13F961175 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234029AbhECNRe (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 09:17:34 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:55587 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234170AbhECNQv (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 09:16:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620047757; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DSRbYPurKI4e7C4gWHrv9oXOAAUShsDTAm8CvlGmLRE=; b=OFLQVLSJGAq8zYAmN7rS+9zhJRbfMqgx+9bAVseMHqRfk3f0PmqrBX/KF20Pkiq9PQEpUp +7AhsVpciT3YUK9h9qGhrVMR50VwdhHZvCPyiau9UDMqpB7ceYIwDQ5y/rKzAsH/2GYJsD /FfHceWKjzRXUadVwT2dDAEO4Kv5wLg= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-520-erkcKe5gNiClf5VXl-m0ag-1; Mon, 03 May 2021 09:15:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: erkcKe5gNiClf5VXl-m0ag-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id a14-20020a2e7f0e0000b02900b9011db00cso2520066ljd.8 for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 06:15:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DSRbYPurKI4e7C4gWHrv9oXOAAUShsDTAm8CvlGmLRE=; b=NWcmy+A/dX9GBtDLoXo+5ddYFmE8Z8e0+09dfSK/f7HkeJ9MI1HtlXuYOLeukLthVm EHr+3gl0MnTYDUphZR4NCBdDbzGZGu6QDDy9TGH9KdDB22JC30wlFZR6+FeK+94D/im9 ne7Gu20iH9azeTM/TNsEHAjBdSt3ZASoWWyWLtwwY7s5LwdMINCX6Y6wtqfODoebIJGm 1jmR5aOvCm7dRpYKpy7sdQeDYqyFJmzghmwfCwc4G+N8Q+eWSb6IGAfcyGBHjBk1WBuS VvmWQE6gF4xDxSrJt1iSP8vnw6/iw7jKAQtzQioa3mIao46mFCxLSIYSniRm+OqVi6KL hjPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Apvxrfay7md4TuwdUqP4Msg3+kl8qvW0w1yVv85Mh4bykdPdx 51MgHKI/MPz0ov5ZT7+YrlruAUzfFMI4DNS7059rv/Vp0gd7BHOnaeSU7ClkAy50v2M73nXxTyk 43EoAAU+K2KjUcixQRbd0TYwKs9s3UfgUmScRfj+e X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a08:: with SMTP id q8mr13204357lfn.12.1620047754108; Mon, 03 May 2021 06:15:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9vFTWw26Bz6L2Xra00hzqXnOSRPp+WnUdBy//UrVLHLkrC+WuOtvUxrn3BuqHUBQmmkg+YlydgpN904FYrpU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a08:: with SMTP id q8mr13204323lfn.12.1620047753857; Mon, 03 May 2021 06:15:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200625223443.2684-1-nitesh@redhat.com> <20210128165903.GB38339@fuller.cnet> <87h7n0de5a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20210204181546.GA30113@fuller.cnet> <20210204190647.GA32868@fuller.cnet> <87y2g26tnt.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <7780ae60-efbd-2902-caaa-0249a1f277d9@redhat.com> <07c04bc7-27f0-9c07-9f9e-2d1a450714ef@redhat.com> <20210406102207.0000485c@intel.com> <1a044a14-0884-eedb-5d30-28b4bec24b23@redhat.com> <20210414091100.000033cf@intel.com> <54ecc470-b205-ea86-1fc3-849c5b144b3b@redhat.com> <87czucfdtf.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87sg37eiqa.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20210430192145.00000e23@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210430192145.00000e23@intel.com> From: Nitesh Lal Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 09:15:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch v4 1/3] lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs To: Jesse Brandeburg Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "frederic@kernel.org" , "juri.lelli@redhat.com" , Marcelo Tosatti , abelits@marvell.com, Robin Murphy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "rostedt@goodmis.org" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "jinyuqi@huawei.com" , "zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, chris.friesen@windriver.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:21 PM Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > Nitesh Lal wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > Nitesh, > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 12:14, Nitesh Lal wrote: > > > > Based on this analysis and the fact that with your re-work the interrupts > > > > seems to be naturally spread across the CPUs, will it be safe to revert > > > > Jesse's patch > > > > > > > > e2e64a932 genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint() > > > > > > > > as it overwrites the previously set IRQ affinity mask for some of the > > > > devices? > > > > > > That's a good question. My gut feeling says yes. > > > > > > > Jesse do you want to send the revert for the patch? > > > > Also, I think it was you who suggested cc'ing > > intel-wired-lan ml as that allows intel folks, to do some initial > > testing? > > If so, we can do that here (IMHO). > > Patch sent here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210501021832.743094-1-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com/T/#u > > Any testing appreciated! > > Jesse > Thank you! -- Nitesh