From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL 0/4] Python patches
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 18:22:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFn=p-Zpvf4W1zZtnv5a9sn=38=dgsa7HUMnYM7dk7xW7gRB3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9fJMQizPmd1rUh7wPgPoz4dAXQPP07DzDFQK1ieN72VA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:52 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 16:38, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022, 11:20 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> Summary of Failures:
> >>
> >> 1/1 qemu:block / qemu-iotests qcow2 ERROR 243.14s exit status 1
I'm not too familiar with this new test runner, yet. (Is this error
even anything to do with the python lib? I guess I can't rule it
out...)
I just got a clean run of 'make vm-build-netbsd', so I'm using that
output as reference and making some guesses.
If I search the output for 'qcow2', I see the following output (with
possibly many lines between each hit):
1/1 qemu:block / qemu-iotests qcow2 RUNNING
>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=205 PYTHON=/usr/pkg/bin/python3.7 /bin/sh /home/qemu/qemu-test.lj6FNa/build/../src/tests/qemu-iotests/../check-block.sh qcow2
▶ 1/1 qcow2 001 OK
▶ 1/1 qcow2 002 OK
▶ 1/1 qcow2 004 OK
... and so on and so forth ...
▶ 1/1 qcow2 299 OK
▶ 1/1 qcow2 313 SKIP
▶ 1/1 qcow2 nbd-qemu-allocation SKIP
▶ 1/1 qcow2 qsd-jobs OK
1/1 qemu:block / qemu-iotests qcow2 OK 176.35s 74
subtests passed
I tried modifying 040 to fail on purpose, and I see:
▶ 1/1 qcow2 039 OK
▶ 1/1 qcow2 040 FAIL
▶ 1/1 qcow2 041 OK
[...]
▶ 1/1 qcow2 nbd-qemu-allocation OK
▶ 1/1 qcow2 qsd-jobs OK
1/1 qemu:block / qemu-iotests qcow2 ERROR 106.06s
exit status 1
Summary of Failures:
1/1 qemu:block / qemu-iotests qcow2 ERROR 106.06s exit status 1
I don't think I see it on the output you mailed, but can you point out
which test is failing, at least? Grepping for 'FAIL' should be
helpful.
--js
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 1:59 [PULL 0/4] Python patches John Snow
2022-02-03 1:59 ` [PULL 1/4] python/aqmp: Fix negotiation with pre-"oob" QEMU John Snow
2022-02-03 1:59 ` [PULL 2/4] python/machine: raise VMLaunchFailure exception from launch() John Snow
2022-02-03 1:59 ` [PULL 3/4] python: upgrade mypy to 0.780 John Snow
2022-02-03 1:59 ` [PULL 4/4] python/aqmp: add socket bind step to legacy.py John Snow
2022-02-03 16:20 ` [PULL 0/4] Python patches Peter Maydell
2022-02-03 16:38 ` John Snow
2022-02-03 16:51 ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-03 23:22 ` John Snow [this message]
2022-02-08 14:40 ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-15 17:45 ` John Snow
2022-02-15 18:00 ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-15 19:02 ` John Snow
2022-02-04 17:03 ` Peter Maydell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-10 23:25 John Snow
2022-01-12 9:20 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFn=p-Zpvf4W1zZtnv5a9sn=38=dgsa7HUMnYM7dk7xW7gRB3g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.