From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andrej_Krut=C3=A1k?= Subject: Re: Fwd: Regression: Line6 Toneport stops working on 4.10-rc5 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:04:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170126074724.GA9837@kroah.com> <20170126093002.GA787@kroah.com> <20170127165429.GA19745@kroah.com> <20170206101844.GA10982@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yb0-f196.google.com (mail-yb0-f196.google.com [209.85.213.196]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD8E2667FE for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:04:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb0-f196.google.com with SMTP id j82so3355595ybg.2 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 03:04:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Greg KH , Igor Zinovev , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:18:44 +0100, > Greg KH wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:01:56PM +0300, Igor Zinovev wrote: >> > Hello again! >> > >> > Thanks for the advice, but bisecting the whole tree took me quite a >> > while and I ended up stuck because booting on some bisect states has >> > led my system to run without some devices, like wireless and sound. So >> > I tried to bisect the sound/usb/line6 path. It turns out that this >> > commit is the point where it breaks for me: >> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/sound/usb/line6?id=f6a0dd107ad0c8b59d1c9735eea4b8cb9f460949 >> > >> > In fact, when I apply the reverse patch on top of 4.10-rc7, it fixes >> > the problem for me. >> >> Wonderful, thanks so much for tracking this down! >> >> > Should I bring some of the people that are mentioned in the commit >> > into this conversation? >> >> I've done so now. Andrej and Takashi, the above patch causes a >> regression for Igor, any thoughts? Should we just revert it? > > Yeah, the patch looks wrong, the function line6_get_interval() should > be called unconditionally. > > I'm going to queue a revert for 4.10-final. > Yep, on the first look it's suspicious. I'll have a look on it in the evening - not sure simple revert is the ideal solution... I'll get back to you. PS: Thanks for the bisecting, Igor! PPS: Maybe this should go also to 4.9 stable, once resolved... -- Greetings, Andrej