All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, 3/8] usb: hub: Power-cycle on root-hub ports
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:51:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iH-9Au-f2dSund4jTcwCyDCphc4WtNxVxn72TJ3gDCqug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366398003-20027-1-git-send-email-jwerner@chromium.org>

HI Julius,


On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> wrote:
>> XHCI ports are powered on after a H/W reset, however
>> EHCI ports are not. So disabling and re-enabling power
>> on all ports invariably.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amar <amarendra.xt@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes from v2:
>>  - Replaced USB_HUB_PRINTFs to debug()
>>
>>  common/usb_hub.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/usb_hub.c b/common/usb_hub.c
>> index f2a0285..e4f4e3c 100644
>> --- a/common/usb_hub.c
>> +++ b/common/usb_hub.c
>> @@ -100,11 +100,45 @@ static void usb_hub_power_on(struct usb_hub_device *hub)
>>       int i;
>>       struct usb_device *dev;
>>       unsigned pgood_delay = hub->desc.bPwrOn2PwrGood * 2;
>> +     ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER(struct usb_port_status, portsts, 1);
>> +     unsigned short portstatus;
>> +     int ret;
>>
>>       dev = hub->pusb_dev;
>>       /* Enable power to the ports */
>>       debug("enabling power on all ports\n");
>>       for (i = 0; i < dev->maxchild; i++) {
>> +             /*
>> +              * Power-cycle the ports here: aka,
>> +              * turning them off and turning on again.
>> +              */
>> +             usb_clear_port_feature(dev, i + 1, USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER);
>> +             debug("port %d returns %lX\n", i + 1, dev->status);
>> +
>> +             /* Wait at least 2*bPwrOn2PwrGood for PP to change */
>> +             mdelay(pgood_delay);
>
> This adds 20ms per port to USB boot times... is it really necessary? Why do we
> need to powercycle XHCI ports? Couldn't we just check if the ports are powered
> and only power them on if they aren't?

This 20ms delay is truely being taken to be on safer side (twice of
Power-on-to-power-good),
its not observational.
In my earlier patch-series, we were doing the same way as you are
suggesting here (power-on
ports only if they aren't), however Marek suggested to power-cycle the
ports. This would ensure
that we don't have any spurious Port status (telling us that port is
powered up).

Actually i was seeing a strage behavior on USB 2.0 protocol ports
available with XHCI.
Since all ports with XHCI are powered-up after a Chip-reset, the
instant we do a power-on
on these ports (as with original code - simply setting the PORT_POWER
feature), the Connect status
change bit used to get cleared (however Current connect status bit was
still set).

So we arrived at solution that either we don't power-up XHCI ports or
do a power-cycle on them.

>
> If you insist, please at least parallelize this. Disable power on all ports,
> wait, then check and reenable it.

Hmm, so right now we are doing this for one port at a time.
I am sure parallelising things as you suggested would be best to do here, but
can you please explain, would handling one port at a time lead to unwanted
behavior from Host's side somehow ?

>
>> +
>> +             ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
>> +             if (ret < 0) {
>> +                     debug("port %d: get_port_status failed\n", i + 1);
>
> This is a severe error (because the ports won't come up again), so I think it
> should be a printf() instead of a debug().

Sure, will change this to pritnf()

>
>> +                     return;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             /*
>> +              * Check to confirm the state of Port Power:
>> +              * xHCI says "After modifying PP, s/w shall read
>> +              * PP and confirm that it has reached the desired state
>> +              * before modifying it again, undefined behavior may occur
>> +              * if this procedure is not followed".
>> +              * EHCI doesn't say anything like this, but no harm in keeping
>> +              * this.
>> +              */
>> +             portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>> +             if (portstatus & (USB_PORT_STAT_POWER << 1)) {
>> +                     debug("port %d: Port power change failed\n", i + 1);
>
> Same as above.

Sure, will change this.

>
>> +                     return;
>> +             }
>> +
>>               usb_set_port_feature(dev, i + 1, USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER);
>>               debug("port %d returns %lX\n", i + 1, dev->status);
>>       }



-- 
Best Regards
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-22  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-12 11:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] usb: ss: Some fixes and cleanup for USB super-speed support Vivek Gautam
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/8] usb: common: Weed out USB_**_PRINTFs from usb framework Vivek Gautam
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/8] USB: Some cleanup prior to USB 3.0 interface addition Vivek Gautam
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/8] usb: hub: Power-cycle on root-hub ports Vivek Gautam
2013-04-19 19:00   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Julius Werner
2013-04-22  8:21     ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2013-04-22 22:02       ` Julius Werner
2013-04-23  6:45         ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/8] usb: Update device class in usb device's descriptor Vivek Gautam
2013-04-19 18:39   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Julius Werner
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/8] usb: hub: Fix enumration timeout Vivek Gautam
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/8] USB: SS: Add support for Super Speed USB interface Vivek Gautam
2013-04-19 18:22   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, " Julius Werner
2013-04-19 18:38     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 20:32       ` Julius Werner
2013-04-20 11:57         ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-22  6:46           ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-23  2:24             ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-23  6:46               ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-22  6:43     ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-22 22:14       ` Julius Werner
2013-04-23  4:39         ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 7/8] usb: hub: Reset only usb 2.0 ports Vivek Gautam
2013-04-23 17:23   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v3,7/8] " Julius Werner
2013-04-24  0:21     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-24  6:08       ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-30 12:24         ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-30 17:11           ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-12 11:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/8] usb: common: Use a global macro for 'min3' Vivek Gautam
2013-04-14 17:11   ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19  9:38     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: common: Use a global definition " Vivek Gautam
2013-04-19 11:29       ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-22 13:45         ` Tom Rini
2013-04-24  6:19           ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-24  6:21             ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-24 12:03               ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-14 17:14 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] usb: ss: Some fixes and cleanup for USB super-speed support Marek Vasut
2013-04-18  6:25   ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-18 12:38     ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-18 13:08       ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-14 18:13 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-18  6:24   ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-18 10:59     ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-18 11:08       ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-18 12:43         ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-18 17:11           ` Julius Werner
2013-04-18 19:15             ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19  4:51               ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFp+6iH-9Au-f2dSund4jTcwCyDCphc4WtNxVxn72TJ3gDCqug@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gautamvivek1987@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.