From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1581CA9EA0 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D3021897 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="QuCbofG0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389980AbfJRJWQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 05:22:16 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:37373 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725818AbfJRJWQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 05:22:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1571390534; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E0KuXJ+I6Kyym7Wbp44uifMDO77KHLiStuwB/HjRw6s=; b=QuCbofG0Y4YSNnpocH0f2c6MAH7PO76yZ7kW/QlL+NKIYOJyjvoGCzzKfTyTGuvVI8X8k6 Kwz9untyatSqX0vqqU2xNBpyeP3Xv50o828GAOqkM2nQW+8BGFo1BlLv80irVRVsKUB9mg 7C7fsUUFY9gTO/AjUIR7LfJlvgEMoks= Received: from mail-ot1-f71.google.com (mail-ot1-f71.google.com [209.85.210.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-219-d1-g6ffLNwuLkRv85NH6zw-1; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 05:22:13 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f71.google.com with SMTP id t7so2646034otm.4 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:22:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1diiFOoBn+aPjZNERTJSHqMcI1iFpSGLBN/SfEFseP8=; b=iPxpc9CZivFFQ826Udvv8M1ZS+/uo7cOrV4fdKiczJTNU+/imtbOeF5t4BQCxYpMHE keCVgUEs1bvwmo8IQJTo2HTQro41T6Uu52zlPkLtKKTbcORrmrSdt68eiquMH1r1/CVF aIhYHwWEP9nDyMxEXFqeuTaLqKVdq7JQEZQ/OruNfJ0ieXKKDXSxlZqgYmfMVbJxNyg0 kOt9HVSZFSocd+Hgw9deCnk4FXcPMj6G40g+Uag2LA/n6AzghfR5bT+pW56TDZVIcxpl gytJOHVBOrXEc+NlXpu1ZWKzS5cI0VFrZbOilE6NbHu6/bI3KjuP0Bzfm0ovzl41TNlK T5qw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKbBZ7Qos4x7VwZnwD10n8lwBQPSTTMQ8k7tdWoHB94zS2ssF0 xaUwE83s4NNxax0XVGBIfe/M/0KgG5WuAMHjnjfFAvvPXGV4UF6wNMrTuoFiS5ModzDqlO8w6o5 Fg5GH6t/lubYo5FVi3q/K3GIfOknBdEBJ+g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d9:: with SMTP id r25mr6844853ota.66.1571390532594; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:22:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmmvS7mOLvPx8Fl3ahvtwE7jlYEpguZAzFke5b9Qml1ZYSev7elY0rpQsxeeAVkhb8JSTsRmeXgUeZYgXV6f8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d9:: with SMTP id r25mr6844834ota.66.1571390532291; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:22:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191014080647.19602-1-omosnace@redhat.com> <511ca06c-7786-1b90-4694-a5cb842a8fca@ieee.org> <0a554b63-df42-fbc0-6877-f58c16156a9e@ieee.org> In-Reply-To: <0a554b63-df42-fbc0-6877-f58c16156a9e@ieee.org> From: Ondrej Mosnacek Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH userspace] sepolicy: generate man pages in parallel To: Chris PeBenito Cc: Stephen Smalley , SElinux list X-MC-Unique: d1-g6ffLNwuLkRv85NH6zw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:01 AM Chris PeBenito wrote: > On 10/18/19 5:00 AM, Chris PeBenito wrote: > > On 10/18/19 3:44 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > >> Since there are plans to support > >> only Python 3 in 3.0+ this may not be an issue, but I could also add a > >> few lines to fallback to sequential execution under Python 2 for the > >> sake of compatibility. Would that be OK or should I not bother? > > > > Python 2 end of life is in less than 2 months. Please don't add new > > code only for Python 2 compatibility. > > I can't count. It's a little over 2 months. The point still stands :) OK, I posted a v2 without the fallback. --=20 Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc.