From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Churchill Subject: Re: pgs stuck inactive Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:07:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <3154FE08568349E9B9EB0EBBCE4EDFB2@dreamhost.com> <8260F00ADA384FEDBA6AA9873273BB38@dreamhost.com> <90B1EE3CB1C7494B9B097AD5E4BCF272@dreamhost.com> <454EEF491D1B41C3B0382F1A101BABE0@dreamhost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:62948 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752574Ab2DSJHv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:07:51 -0400 Received: by ghrr11 with SMTP id r11so4224165ghr.19 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:07:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <454EEF491D1B41C3B0382F1A101BABE0@dreamhost.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Greg Farnum Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 18 April 2012 21:41, Greg Farnum wrote: > That should get everything back up and running. The one sour note is that due to the bug in the past, your data (ie, filesystem) and vmimages pools have gotten conflated. It shouldn't cause any issues (they use very different naming schemes), but they're tied together in terms of replication and the raw pool statistics. > (If that's important you can create a new pool and move the rbd images to it.) Thanks a lot Greg! All back up and running now. What negative side effects could having the pools mixed together have, given that I'm not doing any special placement of them?