From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Homann Subject: Re: M-Audio FastTrack C400 Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 09:05:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4F8D63F4.1040208@rauros.net> <4F8DF29B.9090907@rauros.net> <4F8E6CA2.8010005@ladisch.de> <4F8F7213.8070206@rauros.net> <4F8FD2A7.60700@ladisch.de> <4F911629.5090704@gmail.com> <4F920D73.7070309@rauros.net> <4F9CB0D7.5060401@rauros.net> <4F9D4291.6060803@rauros.net> <4FA19CAC.7070704@rauros.net> <4FA36114.2030305@rauros.net> <4FA45B69.5010608@rauros.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f51.google.com (mail-yw0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE192487F for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 09:05:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by yhnn12 with SMTP id n12so553135yhn.38 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 00:05:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FA45B69.5010608@rauros.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: chris-alsa@rauros.net Cc: Grant Diffey , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi again, 2012/5/5 Chris Cavey : > No change. Hmm, do you still get this message: ALSA mixer.c:352 cannot get ctl value: req = 0x83, wValue = 0x101, wIndex = 0x4001, type = 4 ALSA mixer.c:877 64:1: cannot get min/max values for control 1 (id 64) If so, can you please look at mixer.c 352 if line 352 corresponds to get_ctl_value_v2? (My line numbers are a bit off compared to yours it seems). Can you send some Ci lines from usbmon from before the mesasage appears. > According to usbmon looks like no matter what channel I adjust, > the clock ctl is always being adjusted as if the wrong wIndex gets selected. > The clock wIndex is 0x8001 but the mixer volume is 0x4001. The wValue looks > correct (first mixer, according to my docs, should be 0x0100). That's strange. Can you try if your "return 0" instead of "break" in the device parsing is still needed now that we have a mixer quirk? (Just a blind guess...) > I'm going to > trace down the rabbit hole to learn how wValue/wIndex is derived from the > mixer controls. Just compare with the FTUs controls. > > I'll keep tinkering. At some point I should probably just buy you a C400, > probably easier. Have you thought about switching to a MOTU or RME device? Maybe we should work on these ;-) Kind regards, Felix