From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FCBC4338F for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 19:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F6561102 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 19:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237305AbhHTTC5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:02:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235726AbhHTTCy (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:02:54 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82520C061575 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:02:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id i8so20558864ybt.7 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:02:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aurora.tech; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9+o+B6IAFsaudWZB5eaVIpCXEt3MXz5qbAsUHXJ0mT4=; b=ConfS8PBnHrVGcJXL7U4Uo8DEK8G5CtHUbc9lRST0rDwwGNbghyPehk5oAZfQ16f1K f/U+BowC5/TbFswY/FjeagTLSBj+tvujekwPpZYWaZhPtV5V7j7Av5ZAKlFMkupQpht6 NbLAabN4zpymd/Q6ks+TnwRRQfMpeLiOQmaIEnGA3NbxoIvd0Tj0dK1VifcVgqHdZ6hA 8QzA5O8NXydmJZxRkvbMBQDBVgBN8qNCsoeK85Pxy/StBW1zFhLEwJErYltFqk2Bt+dJ QW5TBvonTdZYmlBWs9bJIbj5dzZZ4TQi/gwrE4Z0TqghVuQTtPwzzEiiD9BZ9YZk+GAm LD9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9+o+B6IAFsaudWZB5eaVIpCXEt3MXz5qbAsUHXJ0mT4=; b=LhhLjJWDe1Q6MvvludE9Q/xVpwVD4Po7npy/U5CGSZ9U3oLg/DJXtEClRV5HKkpAbB 4DfA4x9RXWJD+yc04/wTuL+GyAy7xHMh1l0eH2846D4kihovyJ5RX8B48KuzfE6cxrOQ TKRPYxy7M8zeWdz66xqxQcjdksZEq90EM2k9t7TmGnAl/JbeAi5Z3WFlm3asoHtY429c jiD7LrDnxnj7yHWfmTm4EYXDWAOYWzoDt157FzeePv/1gNuF5VVn4mkm48JA4uVYmwFA 8GBmCcQmWA6JoY8QJmQtExWIKuzTGe+9snCxxpLzvCU/oblQUzkGIhkwT2rL2crBbzko qr1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532P+cs57ECOJBPLXKN77NtZHmvCF49cQvHVb6wkxsjvhDfiz9d3 m2JvupJO/pcVj71p8MXQ1WTmg03Ak5i6h/prc3gXfDmdqK6OnQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7q9ZDMUsxB/5Vws6OYNpITvCq7jb9+VrBpE5umqiBPWn5wJx/xALmgNwyv6sJlKx4aSUQgs4RovPzYj1HEXA= X-Received: by 2002:a25:40d4:: with SMTP id n203mr26540810yba.372.1629486134794; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:02:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alison Chaiken Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:02:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: support schedstats for RT sched class To: linux-rt-users Cc: laoar.shao@gmail.com, Andrew Woods Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org In https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/CALOAHbDZPo65Vc89sVCuYkJ6vr=zD-4ev=JN=j7ZAzKHzRibdA@mail.gmail.com/#t, Yafang Shao proposed changes to schedstats that would add support for RT-relevant schedulers to schedstats. As far as I can tell, these patches were neither merged nor explicitly rejected. Is that correct? If mainline kernel has not accepted them, is there any reason that linux-rt-devel should not? Perhaps linux-rt-devel wants to stop accepting patches that are not part of mainline in preference for moving them to staging in anticipation of becoming a pure-Kconfig option? Thanks, Alison Chaiken Aurora Innovation