From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: G Gregory Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ACPI: Add support for AMBA bus type Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:23:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1449199466-6081-1-git-send-email-annie.wang@amd.com> <1449199466-6081-2-git-send-email-annie.wang@amd.com> <20151204085023.GE1593@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20151204091738.GA6572@hr-amur2> <56616021.3050704@huawei.com> <20151204102012.GA6789@hr-amur2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:36592 "EHLO mail-oi0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751214AbbLDKX6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 05:23:58 -0500 Received: by oiww189 with SMTP id w189so65334722oiw.3 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 02:23:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151204102012.GA6789@hr-amur2> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Huang Rui Cc: Hanjun Guo , Mika Westerberg , Wang Hongcheng , Vinod Koul , Joerg Roedel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Borislav Petkov , Wan Zongshun , Ken Xue , Tony Li On 4 December 2015 at 10:20, Huang Rui wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:59:28AM +0000, G Gregory wrote: >> On 4 December 2015 at 09:42, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> > On 2015/12/4 17:17, Huang Rui wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:24:18AM +0800, Wang Hongcheng wrote: >> >>>> From: Huang Rui >> >>>> >> >>>> Inspired by acpi platform bus type, to make driver "porting" more >> >>>> straightforward, this patch introduces ACPI support to the AMBA bus >> >>>> type. Instead of writing ACPI "glue" drivers for the exiting AMBA >> >>>> drivers. >> >>> Hmm, isn't there already similar patch series bringing AMBA ACPI >> >>> support? >> >>> >> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/30/394 >> >> Err, I see the patch for the first time... >> >> >> >> But looks like it isn't accepted till now. Will he continue to work on >> >> it? >> > >> > Sure, Graeme is working on the updated version now :) >> > >> Yes, as Hanjun said I am planning a v2. I've just been caught up in >> other business this week and probably next week. >> > > OK, thanks to clarify it. Could you please take care of AMD use case > that we need a configurable fix_rate clk, periphid, and platform data? > I will take a look at your patch in detail when I redo my series. Thanks Graeme