From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuR7m-0006nN-Ml for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:36:46 +0200 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so402613qyk.6 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D5G/dBIsgYdA1BM0Cz3vVWceg9UBI27Ej5ByY5MhD6Q=; b=ssR6N/REQmZMrWEmB5OB/dE6wyNApSo0q0m6js/7AMUXtndWAl0gjKcVOX+TfwXaJK CCG0GdAYwvyvO5ElaDqHBNzJt1AQ0M9Y2KR9RZSaAxjXIgOtddoEiRjpWtiQ3OSbPdIs 2XeCIMEvJAZpqy9wDue6xcJ89JBXcWaQBMV9Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.199 with SMTP id co7mr2341667vdb.85.1313767925060; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.112.161 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E4E8152.5030500@gmail.com> References: <4E3A3C4B.8040208@dresearch-fe.de> <4E40FCA9.7060204@dresearch-fe.de> <4E439289.3050005@dresearch-fe.de> <1615282.kebj4eQ1MV@perseus> <4E44C076.90407@dresearch-fe.de> <4E4E28AB.8010806@dresearch-fe.de> <4E4E717C.2040506@gmail.com> <4E4E8152.5030500@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:32:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: Steve Sakoman To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Khem Raj Subject: Re: [2011.03-maintenance] unsatisfied dependencies to libgcc X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:36:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> Is there an easy way to tell OE to ignore a recommends for either >> libgcc-dev or libgcc-s-dev? =A0The issue seems to be (at least on my >> machine) that packages more or less randomly recommend one or the >> other. =A0Then the image build fails because the two packages supply the >> same file. > > I dont think there is a way out. I think one of those 2 packages should b= e > stopped from building Which do you think should be disabled? Steve