From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB48C4332F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B06135E for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351891AbhJAEye (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 00:54:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34190 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242214AbhJAEyd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 00:54:33 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F1DC06176E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id r1so17889356ybo.10 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HSY5dUG0iWk0wmOHITmVmnD9YYtjGnNr2FW0qw66Pe4=; b=ERvLu10phYrVrUIUT3FzdDeg2rgbZvK7s0wbD18UwtSTLHKvY+YAMQN2Z4wvYwRRiL /iRsVFxQjqeYWGoJQV/Rdo+r09ydttg3pJqOhGWg3MyiGhvh/JiMTgy0TZM2cBXSmGrp L0ERj0n5zOOzIzH5m/U7eBBJPWYKbnOJ5JEUDDAyXqEOrDPwvMBP1Dr/RbnG6FqSxegE ulQ4x5AozNlp0wP1JYC8A3wJ0IXc4kgWceI+UcywptFCLQOaNgQeoq2dnO8oMLWez+UK c2f6pDqf7TqUq0GspOOliKauJ7YJqi+MU5ExnkpEsXJxt4ahiYH6wzRY1oLkDhkvXcx3 yahQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HSY5dUG0iWk0wmOHITmVmnD9YYtjGnNr2FW0qw66Pe4=; b=GwD9kdqH7ca5YdNl9iqouyacfxDwDOtsfFIL0r37Rn2QyJcPsNcUCk7BE/LhOLXYsH lDPw5LaR8PxKn3kM8KtFO2TCG9eBEeeHybfebgG0qBBHfqbBjztHQ7hlxTvlBV35PBWE i5IoM8KJZRFRsANNypubR99Yn+J0x6JA4a7YWTzAfeIG3YuAB4nnfFUbebDqFmlAUddW wYtdPdet3dM467X6wEk4+iTqei5tY+Or7/R020ENO64KqxCxqTFu+WFrJS9G3EYtp/hx 2zZbC+GOPFgJCx+opcyEfiybzqhulfJO7B/NxWjEL9aHVP8NJc3a6pCeJsmpsWQueuk/ B3vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GQtVMvaWOkYGg0hPz1/gYhGoyjkin4+hAH3Amcb8bjVR2f6Uk VfaYmUNsKyLbLz1IUR/CmjhZtyhvRCfvoCNgSjkrFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygycpZauu9TFmc+TzH6Xxv9d3sYB6IkEM/HcmQ8hM9+hQo2lPA+CHRH3RKW0G4hzlav9jzO/VJG+svIlgQKNg= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4684:: with SMTP id t126mr3386461yba.476.1633063968846; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210928235635.1348330-1-willmcvicker@google.com> <7766faf8-2dd1-6525-3b9a-8ba790c29cff@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Saravana Kannan Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tomasz Figa , Lee Jones , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Will McVicker , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Linus Walleij , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Cc: Android Kernel" , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-samsung-soc , linux-clk , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:02 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:10:31PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Generally, the subsystems being mentioned here are so basic (clock, > > pinctrl, rtc), that I really can't imagine what kind of rocket science > > one might want to hide for competitive reasons... If it's for an > > entire SoC, I wonder why Intel and AMD don't have similar concerns and > > contribute support for their newest hardware far before the release. > > There is no reason at all, and to be honest this whole discussion with > these bullshit arguments from the Google/Linaro/SoC vendor crowd just > shows how on crack these people are, and shows a good example of why > we should not support these models at all. There is no good reason > to "overide" uptream functionality EVER. Stop digging yourselves into > your ever bigger holes and just f***king contribute upstream NOW. Just > as we always have we should not give you more rope to shoot yoursel > while ausing us extra overhead. Maybe you need to read up the code of conduct again. -Saravana From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFF8C433F5 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394316134F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:54:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 394316134F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jhY5QT+/MhoPpKULdhK1WdE5xClWpN2UPIXrn+Vf2Fs=; b=pC3wjpLkA/ZS51 RSxtHRqvhuhyDXAWCDsk6X015S097V2Y3UxX40+yLHJw/8fhGGB+mN66RbPJeH12+REg83BHElAIV 47n2eqUcb/LsNHtedIqHQfU3ePujCix+5zC1w8XMPKw5WAuZebryo4Moo1Wk5YqPH69/Y2fmgeeX7 LCk9+3ppIiIRskE/iXVkxX+TkQzZO5qZmCSBBRuwaTAme6W20wHQxlYoHh+AUuiPhNj1i509I4hJV e331ZIwwKigwvKW06D5JjVC6KdGGw43KBFRI+zLfOYgQ5qj+V/D3Ki8HStbo2HHFCBwiQ0jdCc8KK YvNPYdOkie6hGmgWZ57w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mWAXZ-00Gdmx-HD; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 04:52:57 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mWAXV-00Gdlr-Eb for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 04:52:54 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id b82so17957291ybg.1 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HSY5dUG0iWk0wmOHITmVmnD9YYtjGnNr2FW0qw66Pe4=; b=ERvLu10phYrVrUIUT3FzdDeg2rgbZvK7s0wbD18UwtSTLHKvY+YAMQN2Z4wvYwRRiL /iRsVFxQjqeYWGoJQV/Rdo+r09ydttg3pJqOhGWg3MyiGhvh/JiMTgy0TZM2cBXSmGrp L0ERj0n5zOOzIzH5m/U7eBBJPWYKbnOJ5JEUDDAyXqEOrDPwvMBP1Dr/RbnG6FqSxegE ulQ4x5AozNlp0wP1JYC8A3wJ0IXc4kgWceI+UcywptFCLQOaNgQeoq2dnO8oMLWez+UK c2f6pDqf7TqUq0GspOOliKauJ7YJqi+MU5ExnkpEsXJxt4ahiYH6wzRY1oLkDhkvXcx3 yahQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HSY5dUG0iWk0wmOHITmVmnD9YYtjGnNr2FW0qw66Pe4=; b=AwYnqakg5Qq0MpyDD9P5gVndhzcmiCKIipbyucUKlHzs7Ca+kyBaiTdcyj5eukDiiq NJ3XwMZfP1mGzs9fom7akadGG5O9NkootX7CPMQkwlBB0ji2jJDM9XvquUd85H+gjlMh +WRyIVScbL5H4wqXjEehbmV9zEBEbLWzkO3jrfeFnkO38USxGUib3SC9OBn0cRN/EkA9 dR3LjUm6kEfam0b1XNrCZoMCIINJHifbJEUwhM+9lIzhsuqSRjz1RsC5Tj+SkWBQBKHz kBIxEniDc/TOoF+dj+TU3Nor4tbK/XUGLnv39Yh2tMU3qSeu+3pusLrjiM0C7eMtbUPx HdMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531F5zpH3Lkuodt4gWUzxqDJC+4dgZuQlICMRBqigg3BGy44Kc1H AknZr2vYb+bkTTJ/LJIro1gov4kab2w1CC7XR9HV/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygycpZauu9TFmc+TzH6Xxv9d3sYB6IkEM/HcmQ8hM9+hQo2lPA+CHRH3RKW0G4hzlav9jzO/VJG+svIlgQKNg= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4684:: with SMTP id t126mr3386461yba.476.1633063968846; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210928235635.1348330-1-willmcvicker@google.com> <7766faf8-2dd1-6525-3b9a-8ba790c29cff@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Saravana Kannan Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tomasz Figa , Lee Jones , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Will McVicker , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Linus Walleij , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Cc: Android Kernel" , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-samsung-soc , linux-clk , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210930_215253_511861_7DAE22A6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:02 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:10:31PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Generally, the subsystems being mentioned here are so basic (clock, > > pinctrl, rtc), that I really can't imagine what kind of rocket science > > one might want to hide for competitive reasons... If it's for an > > entire SoC, I wonder why Intel and AMD don't have similar concerns and > > contribute support for their newest hardware far before the release. > > There is no reason at all, and to be honest this whole discussion with > these bullshit arguments from the Google/Linaro/SoC vendor crowd just > shows how on crack these people are, and shows a good example of why > we should not support these models at all. There is no good reason > to "overide" uptream functionality EVER. Stop digging yourselves into > your ever bigger holes and just f***king contribute upstream NOW. Just > as we always have we should not give you more rope to shoot yoursel > while ausing us extra overhead. Maybe you need to read up the code of conduct again. -Saravana _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel