From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941CAC282E7 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 00:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229634AbiHMAwe (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:52:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233675AbiHMAwd (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:52:33 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B9632BA4 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31f661b3f89so24451347b3.11 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:52:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=WbYPnHR9HxWi35dBvBrbYSupoHoVU6IHkJrer8aofZg=; b=G36nprOTrr0PmY/r2BwuoDf4i3WasiJ4cZpmd9acCRnpeqyMKO2a6Fbu6B7C9Lp8BN JqK+IWDfeW/cPhqLQW8MW2s+9+sK8RYowQwHglCVnXxkWP6Yla7w9T9f8gNmAMhtpArf D13lz7D0k0zBYfPP3xccYAUJkJlvOKXVKawXgLHZ/uGJbp04DKf629ue/aX3iZCcMKMU 0gT1wKrlqfHWG0QUsgPuhcrD8YYbvIsZiJn8SeV0GcSvHaj6kiMpmr0q1C4THEnkSE3N 75aTb9x1yo2ooD5T2ctqo531ZpQqCzAFDLlXIJCZb1riOg3Flv8EKmVV9ltmbWPPFyve ppwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=WbYPnHR9HxWi35dBvBrbYSupoHoVU6IHkJrer8aofZg=; b=RCOT315KGCjQpUHtM2vVLIi+BlclDmj2Gf7Zst9cO7aBpsoTFWMpvHYbfXHYOBkxrc JAW+mpajepNVQgbIs3EhC/5vo5o9ucsw/1I39aHgndZfYhxmZSHFkpmS58U6lHr2YHf+ 3QtH1C2vx61GGT3wyLXGdQRw+UTweiDoR3vsPzOV5qDKZDWeV1FEvEmSjRQdHq7GdRRi rq6AzY0qPH2Dp6wtUWPahlM38aHBzbX3TRgRCR5VlbZ6aBMXYq8Zx8o8XFkjjxqqe9MY io0u0LayhlNTKjjvCLrUPrzGwFNHvCegUahNlZTKR8BX+O/BYXoxl0iomGYgNN3eHZmO aQig== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1gZxagdCvDz5RuYcx+GyOIpeZA400rg9kVrcPW7NvYEfkihO2I lsztqVPOehV+wRPKzF+T5mo8mahGQozhrn4zDpFDTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6k6YUMLYwWVgKkXkzA9eQcDh7PvZyVqo7+64YRZILB50qMGsLs3wg/aVWSq5qiOyNQ+Uwd8c5jcYUTJUBcQ7k= X-Received: by 2002:a81:998c:0:b0:326:5dab:df3f with SMTP id q134-20020a81998c000000b003265dabdf3fmr6066292ywg.126.1660351951117; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:52:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220810060040.321697-1-saravanak@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Saravana Kannan Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:51:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Len Brown , Abel Vesa , Alexander Stein , Sudeep Holla , Geert Uytterhoeven , John Stultz , Doug Anderson , Guenter Roeck , kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Saravana Kannan [220810 05:54]: > > Tony, > > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle. > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add: > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren Thanks for testing! Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on? IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed in the email will get around to testing this series. -Saravana > I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the > earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this > series. I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there. -Saravana