All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:29:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_taUrZc0LSZrT9WP5qBxiCfUJ=N9AGaFD87Pd+TJu8YA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d5914f095556119f4a38def9297accd@walle.cc>

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:04 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>
> Am 2021-01-05 20:00, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:35 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
> >> > tries to get away without creating fwnode links in the name of saving
> >> > memory usage. Past attempts to optimize runtime at the cost of memory
> >> > usage were blocked with request for data showing that the optimization
> >> > made significant improvement for real world scenarios.
> >> >
> >> > We have those scenarios now. There have been several reports of boot
> >> > time increase in the order of seconds in this thread [1]. Several OEMs
> >> > and SoC manufacturers have also privately reported significant
> >> > (350-400ms) increase in boot time due to all the parsing done by
> >> > fw_devlink.
> >> >
> >> > So this patch uses all the setup done by the previous patches in this
> >> > series to refactor fw_devlink to be more efficient. Most of the code has
> >> > been moved out of firmware specific (DT mostly) code into driver core.
> >> >
> >> > This brings the following benefits:
> >> > - Instead of parsing the device tree multiple times during bootup,
> >> >   fw_devlink parses each fwnode node/property only once and creates
> >> >   fwnode links. The rest of the fw_devlink code then just looks at these
> >> >   fwnode links to do rest of the work.
> >> >
> >> > - Makes it much easier to debug probe issue due to fw_devlink in the
> >> >   future. fw_devlink=on blocks the probing of devices if they depend on
> >> >   a device that hasn't been added yet. With this refactor, it'll be very
> >> >   easy to tell what that device is because we now have a reference to
> >> >   the fwnode of the device.
> >> >
> >> > - Much easier to add fw_devlink support to ACPI and other firmware
> >> >   types. A refactor to move the common bits from DT specific code to
> >> >   driver core was in my TODO list as a prerequisite to adding ACPI
> >> >   support to fw_devlink. This series gets that done.
> >> >
> >> > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/ea02f57e-871d-cd16-4418-c1da4bbc4696@ti.com/
> >> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> >> > Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> >> > Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> >>
> >> git bisect show that this commit broke my board in 5.11-rc1:
> >>
> >> [    2.294375] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
> >> '/devices/virtual/devlink/0000:00:00.1--0000:00:00.1'
> >> [    2.303999] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> >> 5.11.0-rc1-00016-ga0fb284b267 #267
> >> [    2.312125] Hardware name: Kontron SMARC-sAL28 (4 Lane) (DT)
> >> [    2.317804] Call trace:
> >> [    2.320253]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b8
> >> [    2.323936]  show_stack+0x20/0x70
> >> [    2.327263]  dump_stack+0xd8/0x134
> >> [    2.330677]  sysfs_warn_dup+0x6c/0x88
> >> [    2.334351]  sysfs_create_dir_ns+0xe8/0x100
> >> [    2.338547]  kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x290
> >> [    2.342833]  kobject_add+0xa0/0x108
> >> [    2.346331]  device_add+0xfc/0x798
> >> [    2.349746]  device_link_add+0x454/0x5e0
> >> [    2.353682]  fw_devlink_create_devlink+0xb8/0xc8
> >> [    2.358316]  __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x84/0x180
> >> [    2.363474]  __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x134/0x180
> >> [    2.368718]  device_add+0x778/0x798
> >> [    2.372217]  device_register+0x28/0x38
> >> [    2.375979]  __mdiobus_register+0x94/0x340
> >> [    2.380089]  of_mdiobus_register+0xb4/0x380
> >> [    2.384285]  enetc_pf_probe+0x73c/0xb10
> >> [    2.388132]  local_pci_probe+0x48/0xb8
> >> [    2.391896]  pci_device_probe+0x120/0x1c0
> >> [    2.395920]  really_probe+0xec/0x3c0
> >> [    2.399505]  driver_probe_device+0x60/0xc0
> >> [    2.403614]  device_driver_attach+0x7c/0x88
> >> [    2.407810]  __driver_attach+0x60/0xe8
> >> [    2.411570]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0
> >> [    2.415419]  driver_attach+0x2c/0x38
> >> [    2.419004]  bus_add_driver+0x194/0x1f8
> >> [    2.422851]  driver_register+0x6c/0x128
> >> [    2.426698]  __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0x58
> >> [    2.430983]  enetc_pf_driver_init+0x2c/0x38
> >> [    2.435181]  do_one_initcall+0x54/0x2d8
> >> [    2.439029]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1fc/0x268
> >> [    2.443403]  kernel_init+0x1c/0x120
> >> [    2.446904]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
> >> [    2.450502] kobject_add_internal failed for
> >> 0000:00:00.1--0000:00:00.1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things
> >> with the same name in the same directory.
> >>
> >> Looks like it will generate that link twice? Let me know if I can help
> >> testing.
> >>
> >> See also: https://lavalab.kontron.com/scheduler/job/3894#L831
> >
> > I'll look into this this week. Is the DT for this board in upstream?
> > If so, can you point me to the DT file(s)?
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-kontron-kbox-a-230-ls.dts
>
> > Also, can you give me the output of this?
> > find /sys/devices -type d | grep "0000:00:00.1"
>
> # uname -a
> Linux buildroot 5.11.0-rc1-next-20210104 #298 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jan 5
> 21:55:23 CET 2021 aarch64 GNU/Linux
> # find /sys/devices -type d | grep "0000:00:00.1"
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/power
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/statistics
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/power
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-6
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-6/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-4
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-4/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-7
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-2
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-2/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-5
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-0
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-0/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-3
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-1
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-7
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-7/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-5
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-5/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-3
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-3/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-6
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-1
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/tx-1/byte_queue_limits
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-4
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-2
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/net/eno1/queues/rx-0
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/statistics
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/power
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/statistics
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/regulator
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/regulator/regulator.3
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/regulator/regulator.3/power
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/regulator/regulator.4
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/regulator/regulator.4/power
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/mdio_bus/0000:00:00.1/0000:00:00.1:04/power
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/msi_irqs
> /sys/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/link
> /sys/devices/virtual/devlink/5000000.iommu--0000:00:00.1


Sent a fix. Any further discussion will most likely continue in that thread.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210106232641.459081-1-saravanak@google.com/T/#u

-Saravana

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-21  2:02 [PATCH v2 00/17] Refactor fw_devlink to significantly improve boot time Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] Revert "driver core: Avoid deferred probe due to fw_devlink_pause/resume()" Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] Revert "driver core: Rename dev_links_info.defer_sync to defer_hook" Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] Revert "driver core: Don't do deferred probe in parallel with kernel_init thread" Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] Revert "driver core: Remove check in driver_deferred_probe_force_trigger()" Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] Revert "of: platform: Batch fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices" Saravana Kannan
2020-12-07 22:18   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] Revert "driver core: fw_devlink: Add support for batching fwnode parsing" Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] driver core: Add fwnode_init() Saravana Kannan
2020-12-06  7:26   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-07 19:25     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-07 19:53       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-07 20:36         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-08  6:34           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-07 22:20   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] driver core: Add fwnode link support Saravana Kannan
2020-12-06  7:48   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-07 19:25     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-07 19:56       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-07 22:21   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] driver core: Allow only unprobed consumers for SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] device property: Add fwnode_is_ancestor_of() and fwnode_get_next_parent_dev() Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] driver core: Redefine the meaning of fwnode_operations.add_links() Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] driver core: Add fw_devlink_parse_fwtree() Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] driver core: Use device's fwnode to check if it is waiting for suppliers Saravana Kannan
2022-06-27 11:42   ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-27 22:30     ` Saravana Kannan
2022-06-28 15:24       ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-28 15:44         ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-28 15:55       ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-28 18:09         ` Saravana Kannan
2023-01-05 14:47           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] of: property: Update implementation of add_links() to create fwnode links Saravana Kannan
2020-12-07 22:37   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] efi: " Saravana Kannan
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature Saravana Kannan
2020-11-23 16:00   ` [driver core] 95f755a4ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 2.2% improvement kernel test robot
2020-12-11 14:11   ` [PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature Qian Cai
2020-12-11 14:11     ` Qian Cai
2020-12-11 16:34     ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-11 16:34       ` Robin Murphy
2020-12-11 17:51       ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-11 17:51         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-11 18:03         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-11 18:03           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-11 18:20           ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-11 18:20             ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-11 19:07             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-11 19:07               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-11 22:29               ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-11 22:29                 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-29  3:34   ` Michael Walle
2021-01-05 19:00     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-05 21:03       ` Michael Walle
2021-01-06 23:29         ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2020-11-21  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] driver core: Delete pointless parameter in fwnode_operations.add_links Saravana Kannan
2020-12-07 22:38   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-24  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] Refactor fw_devlink to significantly improve boot time Tomi Valkeinen
2020-11-24 17:25   ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-03 19:05   ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-09 18:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-09 20:24   ` Saravana Kannan
2020-12-10  9:26     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGETcx_taUrZc0LSZrT9WP5qBxiCfUJ=N9AGaFD87Pd+TJu8YA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.