From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1CFC6E00AAA; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:21:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (edwingate8[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D526E007D1 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so23983642wic.0 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:21:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0Bg6q584cfYHf7pTOMkLQgdcqYHMm/PEXvstiwn9fb8=; b=ZYTr7EkHd6AXGkpUVb7qI4o+PDO9gzhSXzWBQyakvxWCW59O9EathzPMF04ADxVTQp j5E70a8OQjw0N+yRi8kF0tkEv8/zBXkf6/EFphubufXyEclRLECtahBxL3a5Jsb7RsDV +3VYCug+hQBCpCGq+ZZ4+xdvjIBkMysLU4jrKJ7hxsFgBs+P89faE4su0RDRnJ6DVSp4 9IKfxsNv++2kL/FGvER7ORTdiNFPxWLShrA+Y/S03J4vsVda8gkHvoz7oM2iHi16df8p Rkh/2zxPf8JPQi4ILaz/fpjOWeYqvoOubWFzOzHwRl2+7Fd6jSlPCLtkT93tsBm2b3E8 lq1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.102.230 with SMTP id fr6mr7888224wib.66.1444886512125; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.1.79 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:21:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <561E64B5.6080702@mindchasers.com> References: <561E64B5.6080702@mindchasers.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:21:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Edward Wingate To: Bob Cochran Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: remoteproc module X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:21:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: > Also, as Otavio previously pointed out, make sure you understand your file > search path. Grep on ^FILESPATH= after running a > > $ bitbake virtual/kernel -e The directory with my defconfig is the very first directory in FILESPATH. Does that mean mine should take precedence over all others? > Have you looked at run.do_configure in your temp directory? You should be > able to find the lines that copy the defconfig and figure it out from there. > Have you looked at run.do_configure in your temp directory? You should be > able to find the lines that copy the defconfig and figure it out from there. Yes, in run.do_configure I see where my defconfig is copied (via sed) to build/.config. I see a few conditionals after that where if build/.config doesn't exist, then it'll copy some other defconfig to build/.config. But I don't see anything that renames an existing build/.config to build/.config.old and uses another defconfig. I put the run.do_configure here: http://pastebin.com/zPfuSwTV I'd appreciate any further pointers to tracking this down.