From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:38509 "EHLO mail-it0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751109AbcFWL3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:29:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <576BC73B.9070503@osg.samsung.com> References: <1466599154-4782-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> <576BC73B.9070503@osg.samsung.com> From: Julian Calaby Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:29:30 +1000 Message-ID: (sfid-20160623_133009_422834_1190A444) Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs_init() To: Luis de Bethencourt Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Johnny Kim , Austin Shin , Chris Park , Tony Cho , Glen Lee , Leo Kim , Greg KH , linux-wireless , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Luis, On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On 23/06/16 02:29, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis de Bethencourt >> wrote: >>> The common format to check if a function returned an error pointer is to >>> use PTR_ERR(). Instead of ERR_PTR() which is used to return said errors. >>> >>> Also, if there was an error returning -EINVAL instead of -1 is more >>> appropriate. >> >> These two changes could be argued to be separate changes deserving of >> their own patches. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt >> >> However if everyone else is ok with that, this is: >> >> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby >> >> Thanks, >> > > Hi Julian, > > If you don't mind I will resend as two separate patches and include your > Reviewed-by in both. Providing there are no changes other than rebasing and splitting, I'm fine with that., Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/