All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	steve.kang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce budgt control in readahead
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 10:37:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWkznGYBAWQCBFRbFCVkFcUZsZ77+yf+Pun6NS8EpmdKdsaBQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWkznHX3OBeMh7-jvAP1HyVaT=TN6Fs2ArUCkUHtE3nVadaDA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 3:35 PM Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:18 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:43:20AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > Thanks for the prompt. I did some basic research on soft RAID and
> > > wonder if applying the bps limit on /dev/md0 like below could make
> > > this work.
> >
> > No.  Look at btrfs' raid support, for example.  it doesn't use md0.
> If I understand the below command correctly, btrfs uses one of the
> volumes within RAID as the mount block device, not /dev/md0. However,
> I think this is a problem of blkio.throttle rather than this commit
> which means this readahead budget control will work accordingly as
> long as blkio.throttle's parameter is configured correctly(eg. 50/50
> on sdb and sdc)
>
> mkfs.btrfs -m raid0 -d raid0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
> mount -t btrfs /dev/sdb /mnt/btr
>
>
>
> >
> > > I didn't find information about 'RAID internally'. Could we set the
> > > limit on the root device(the one used for mount) to manage the whole
> > > partition without caring about where the bio finally goes? Or ask the
> > > user to decide if to use by making sure the device they apply will not
> > > do RAID?
> >
> > No.

@all, Please find below for more test results where we can find this
commit has the result meet the desired value more closely and enhance
it by 3% than mainline.

echo "254:48 20000000" > blkio.throttle.read_bps_device
fio -filename=/data/ylog/ap/000-0101_000015_poweron.ylog -rw=read
-direct=0 -bs=4k -size=2000M -numjobs=8 -group_reporting -name=mytest

    before : IOPS=37.9k, BW=148MiB/s (155MB/s)(11.6GiB/80333msec)
    after  : IOPS=39.0k, BW=153MiB/s (160MB/s)(15.6GiB/104914msec)

    before : clat (usec): min=4, max=1056.6k, avg=197.23, stdev=10080.69
    after  : clat (usec): min=4, max=193481, avg=188.83, stdev=4651.29

    before : lat (usec): min=5, max=1056.6k, avg=200.48, stdev=10080.76
    after  : lat (usec): min=5, max=193483, avg=192.68, stdev=4651.87


echo "254:48 30000000" > blkio.throttle.read_bps_device
fio -filename=/data/ylog/ap/000-0101_000015_poweron.ylog -rw=read
-direct=0 -bs=4k -size=2000M -numjobs=8 -group_reporting -name=mytest

    before : IOPS=57.2k, BW=224MiB/s (234MB/s)(15.6GiB/71561msec)
    after  : IOPS=58.5k, BW=229MiB/s (240MB/s)(15.6GiB/69996msec)

    before : clat (usec): min=4, max=1105.5k, avg=126.20, stdev=6419.22
    after  : clat (usec): min=4, max=183956, avg=120.60, stdev=2957.28

    before : lat (usec): min=5, max=1105.5k, avg=129.45, stdev=6419.29
    after  : lat (usec): min=5, max=183958, avg=124.40, stdev=2958.18

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-09  2:39 [RFC PATCH 0/2] introduce budgt control in readahead zhaoyang.huang
2024-05-09  2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: introduce helper function to calculate bps budgt zhaoyang.huang
2024-05-11 11:15   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-09  2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce budgt control in readahead zhaoyang.huang
2024-05-09  3:15   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-10  2:43     ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-05-10  3:18       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11  7:35         ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-05-14  2:37           ` Zhaoyang Huang [this message]
2024-05-09 12:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-10  3:06     ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-05-10  4:14       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-10  7:08         ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-05-15  1:23 [RFC PATCH 0/2] introduce precised blk-throttle control zhaoyang.huang
2024-05-15  1:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce budgt control in readahead zhaoyang.huang
2024-05-15  4:09   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-15  6:31     ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-05-15  7:40   ` Tejun Heo
2024-05-15  8:17     ` Zhaoyang Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGWkznGYBAWQCBFRbFCVkFcUZsZ77+yf+Pun6NS8EpmdKdsaBQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=steve.kang@unisoc.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.