Re: [PATCH] fs: judging context via current_is_kswapd instead of gfp_flag

[Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:01 PM David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > -             if (!(gfp_flags & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) || !(gfp_flags & __GFP_FS))
> > > > +             if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp_flags & __GFP_FS))
> > > >                       return false;
> > > >               wait_on_page_fscache(page);
> > ...
> > If the gfp flag here is used for judging kswapd context, I think the
> > answer is yes as kswapd applied __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.
>
> Now I come to look at applying it, I'm not sure whether this change is right.
>
> I don't know if kswapd has anything to do with it.  The check is to see if
> we're allowed to block at this point - and wait is just for the completion of
> a DIO write to disk.
>
> It would seem like gfpflags_allow_blocking() is the right thing to call - and
> that should use current_is_kswapd() if appropriate.
>
> David
According to my understanding, this check is redundant according to
current vmscan logic. For the allocation which deny
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM could NOT have the context reach here as there is
no synchronous reclaiming. while kswapd also has __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
set and would also block on the page's release.
>