From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: keescook@google.com In-Reply-To: <20161027124652.2pys4h7tug5wmqge@thigreal> References: <20161025204303.GA36052@beast> <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41BF8C0A@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161027124652.2pys4h7tug5wmqge@thigreal> From: Kees Cook Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 13.1/13] lkdtm: add tests for atomic over-/underflow To: Hans Liljestrand Cc: "Reshetova, Elena" , David Windsor , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" List-ID: On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Hans Liljestrand wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Reshetova, Elena >> wrote: >> > Thank you Kees! I applied the commit to our hardened_atomic_on_next branch and it will be included into the next rfc. >> >> Cool, thanks. I assume this should get atomic64_t and local_t tests as well? >> > > Yes, I'm currently compiling a build with atomic64_t and local_t tests added. > With the improved lkdtm macros its much easier to add the extra types, thank > you Kees! Sure thing! I may have yet-another patch for this, as I didn't like repeating the same things in three files whenever a new test was added. Moar macro magick! -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security