From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2691F453 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726647AbeJSCwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 22:52:30 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f65.google.com ([209.85.208.65]:40711 "EHLO mail-ed1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726424AbeJSCwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 22:52:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r1-v6so29236027edd.7 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KvRVth/To2kw8ZIFPr+Uz1SwHNO339oUh+tZ45c0CrM=; b=sdim8BELfWbTmJXsU1vbfqaLKDoA/wO+Bw37WX/a2B7LmXdqQoAT/A0ICE5BaQq49M 4sLzfbaqnkyAGlI8jr7nKVuMuXLpPD9SOXHueH5/l79OYCjzS9aHeI2Vtapz4evBhdG/ DlEHv4kkFLrk9AW+tpa1AnYPITENlyYUEgVVr17bDGV+rmFKLiPfayJUi2w+jZwtr/dN jsjwzkSgCNHop2oHfX67ILn6hEehxC7se5hMNe57SF8wFfVD/TrvbpbXD7dFq+D06krj HSemei3+3gVne2NOn8l8VH/3BdlDsJPWyQNofOmWab1NWZwpmKmWtiKN4y8NrExkZUI6 4Nyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KvRVth/To2kw8ZIFPr+Uz1SwHNO339oUh+tZ45c0CrM=; b=HY/21A17wOA68LzDy8I27Pn3wfD4oCl3YjMZT/PNwWU3K/QuXvK61fVMKJ+TMNO3PT 2vVa1t4/itzkIC9+3vNC3X8nY6TYQ5PGFqSpphesCB9XjbEJO0SAPCv+k2t5lELt9ubN ZTVTktv0Z499uer/Z5CQO15ZS3u9RYta7FpRY+QIVEnvu1+/jzrcxFTpp61M02lPfipk 1f/B2bhmrYQe2fKF5pf2SIGZz91rNIiDKjhXuM3tWb3KpRCZEsf//bhecQRKe4nFR4ay kGTCPvNlPda3fnZtndt2ims2P67p89m/1m+8mXnY2xJw6Qzd86rpEBCLaakRKk4/CSoW yTXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojF4BXVt7zTkZlogZyBkgHaacZ3ttZpl0/dNLPIQQO4r2cc++sl AAw/9pE808/u7eXm1HsfQEsSQZ173tPiW7CbptQbOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62wKVLLhLH6E3zgHA/Xb8XgRMrxmJoMvrMtcFWXUzxpxIUl5SzLwASy/lMY554/HjzeuDWnXoheUAB/WVdwLRc= X-Received: by 2002:a50:ba89:: with SMTP id x9-v6mr4382780ede.191.1539888608921; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:50:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Beller Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:49:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths To: Johannes Sixt Cc: andreenkosa@gmail.com, Junio C Hamano , git Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:38 AM Johannes Sixt wrote: > There is one peculiarity, though: [...] The explanation makes sense, and the code looks good. Do we want to have a test for this niche case?