Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] t5520: check reflog action in fast-forward merge

[Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>]

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> wrote:
> When testing a fast-forward merge with git-pull, check to see if the
> reflog action is "pull" with the arguments passed to git-pull.
>
> While we are in the vicinity, remove the empty line as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
>     * Added this test to the patch series.
>
>  t/t5520-pull.sh | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5520-pull.sh b/t/t5520-pull.sh
> index b93b735..6045491 100755
> --- a/t/t5520-pull.sh
> +++ b/t/t5520-pull.sh
> @@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ test_expect_success 'pulling into void must not create an octopus' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'test . as a remote' '
> -
>         git branch copy master &&
>         git config branch.copy.remote . &&
>         git config branch.copy.merge refs/heads/master &&
> @@ -95,7 +94,11 @@ test_expect_success 'test . as a remote' '
>         git checkout copy &&
>         test `cat file` = file &&
>         git pull &&
> -       test `cat file` = updated
> +       test `cat file` = updated &&

same as in patch 1

> +       git reflog -1 >reflog.actual &&
> +       sed "s/$_x05[0-9a-f]*/OBJID/g" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy &&
> +       echo "OBJID HEAD@{0}: pull: Fast-forward" >reflog.expected &&
> +       test_cmp reflog.expected reflog.fuzzy
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'the default remote . should not break explicit pull' '
> @@ -106,7 +109,11 @@ test_expect_success 'the default remote . should not break explicit pull' '
>         git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
>         test `cat file` = file &&
>         git pull . second &&
> -       test `cat file` = modified
> +       test `cat file` = modified &&
> +       git reflog -1 >reflog.actual &&
> +       sed "s/$_x05[0-9a-f]*/OBJID/g" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy &&
> +       echo "OBJID HEAD@{0}: pull . second: Fast-forward" >reflog.expected &&
> +       test_cmp reflog.expected reflog.fuzzy
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'fail if wildcard spec does not match any refs' '
> --
> 2.1.4
>


The series looks good to me apart from the minor nits.

Thanks,
Stefan