From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754108AbdC2H05 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:26:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw ([140.112.30.61]:38034 "EHLO smtp.csie.ntu.edu.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753496AbdC2H0z (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:26:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170329071303.ft7oukmhczihy2xb@lukather> References: <20170327143847.16259-1-wens@csie.org> <20170327143847.16259-3-wens@csie.org> <20170329071303.ft7oukmhczihy2xb@lukather> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:26:05 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: sun5i: Add interrupt for display backend To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , David Airlie , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , dri-devel , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:38:47PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The display backend on sun5i shares the same interrupt line as the >> display frontend. Add it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > And ideally, patches prefix shouldn't have dts here too. I've dropped > it and applied, thanks! Seems like this was a recent policy change? Or almost everyone was getting it wrong in the past. >> This won't directly apply to old releases. We may want to backport >> them though? > > Yep, probably. Do you want to send it to stable? It won't apply, due to the recent sun5i merger. We could wait until it lands in Linus' tree, then send a backport patch to stable, to keep the noise to a minimum. ChenYu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen-Yu Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: sun5i: Add interrupt for display backend Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:26:05 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20170327143847.16259-1-wens@csie.org> <20170327143847.16259-3-wens@csie.org> <20170329071303.ft7oukmhczihy2xb@lukather> Reply-To: wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20170329071303.ft7oukmhczihy2xb@lukather> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , David Airlie , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , dri-devel , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:38:47PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The display backend on sun5i shares the same interrupt line as the >> display frontend. Add it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > And ideally, patches prefix shouldn't have dts here too. I've dropped > it and applied, thanks! Seems like this was a recent policy change? Or almost everyone was getting it wrong in the past. >> This won't directly apply to old releases. We may want to backport >> them though? > > Yep, probably. Do you want to send it to stable? It won't apply, due to the recent sun5i merger. We could wait until it lands in Linus' tree, then send a backport patch to stable, to keep the noise to a minimum. ChenYu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wens@csie.org (Chen-Yu Tsai) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:26:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: sun5i: Add interrupt for display backend In-Reply-To: <20170329071303.ft7oukmhczihy2xb@lukather> References: <20170327143847.16259-1-wens@csie.org> <20170327143847.16259-3-wens@csie.org> <20170329071303.ft7oukmhczihy2xb@lukather> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:38:47PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The display backend on sun5i shares the same interrupt line as the >> display frontend. Add it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > And ideally, patches prefix shouldn't have dts here too. I've dropped > it and applied, thanks! Seems like this was a recent policy change? Or almost everyone was getting it wrong in the past. >> This won't directly apply to old releases. We may want to backport >> them though? > > Yep, probably. Do you want to send it to stable? It won't apply, due to the recent sun5i merger. We could wait until it lands in Linus' tree, then send a backport patch to stable, to keep the noise to a minimum. ChenYu