From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46120)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1R5fYg-0001L0-7R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:15:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1R5fYe-00023c-SR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:14:58 -0400
Received: from mail-yi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:33852)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1R5fYe-00023W-Q3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:14:56 -0400
Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so5146262yib.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E765171.8050108@mail.berlios.de>
References: <4E74FC29.1050003@mail.berlios.de>
	<CAGdaadazsUAY6QoNDx1qmXcPCZBUNGP6gi3OAATgw14BWnbBMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E760AB2.50007@mail.berlios.de>
	<CAGdaadbD0v=6AWS7vgsij-5FiSpPgR6REGjO6g2skunL0cCYjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E765171.8050108@mail.berlios.de>
From: Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:14:15 +0700
Message-ID: <CAGdaadbLkKM+1uB-2T+h0gUFGWrBpiq8hJxbrtvZxxaVVUeH-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] tcg/interpreter: Add TCG + interpreter
 for bytecode (virtual machine)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi Stefan....

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:15, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> Am 18.09.2011 18:39, schrieb Mulyadi Santosa:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 22:13, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
>> So, that interpreter, should it be build inside Qemu too? Or can we
>> use/write external one? let's say creating one in python and TCI
>> passes the generated bytecode via UNIX socket to the listening Python
>> script, is that doable or one of the goal your design?
>
> Do you think of something like http://bellard.org/jslinux/?

None specific, but yes, that could be something that describe my idea
:) (anyway, that jslinux is awesome so to speak).

> The current interpreter is built inside QEMU, and I'm afraid
> that separating code generator and interpreter in different
> processes might be a lot of work. Maybe running both in
> separate threads would be possible, so the code generator
> could prepare new bytecode while the interpreter is still
> running the previous one.

Hm, got it...thanks for your kind explanation. I am very appreciate it.


-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com