From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: joeblew99@gmail.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id c5b69e33 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f181.google.com (mail-ot0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b2456448 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a5so4589641oth.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:13:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Joe Blue Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:13:36 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: golang implemenation To: James Tucker Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113b0b6247247e054bd9516a Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --001a113b0b6247247e054bd9516a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ok, thanks for the update. There is no rush from ym side. I was more interested in trying this out. I am working in the Medical Industry where crypto is pretty important and so am looking to run this between mobile devices and the servers. I run golang on mobiles now. Is there any impediment to running n Android and IOS ? I can also try to help with the code. I worked in security but not really crypto. Regards Joe (Berlin) On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:49 AM James Tucker wrote: > I have more in a local repo, but it's very disorganized as I'm taking a > more "port" approach with the internal structures right now. After some > discussions with Jason it seemed I wasn't keeping up enough with some of > the important internal behaviors. Once this port approach is a little > further along I'll be able to carve out meaningful individual pieces with > tests for submitting. > > If you wanted something sooner, cobbling together the uapi code I have in > wireguard-go, with the implementation stuff in go-wireguard would probably > work relatively more quickly than I'll finish off, but the end goal I have > is a little cleaner than what that would be. > > I don't suspect I have a ton of work to do, but mostly it's finding the > time to sit down and make decent chunks of progress, as my day to day is > quite full. If you or others are ready to lay down some time, I'd be more > than willing to push up pieces earlier and/or coordinate. > > If I don't catch up with the ML soon enough, feel free to highlight me in > irc and/or reach out to me over other mediums. I don't keep up with this > email too well when I'm this busy. > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Joe Blue wrote: > > Thanks. > > Seems this is the git endpojnt: https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-go/about/ > > In the toDO there is a fair bit there. Is it ready for me to be able to > work on anything or still very bare bones ? > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:34 PM Jason A. Donenfeld > wrote: > > Hello Joe, > > I defer to James Tucker, CCd, to describe the status of his implementation. > > Regards, > Jason > > > --001a113b0b6247247e054bd9516a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, thanks for the update.=C2=A0

There = is no rush from ym side. I was more interested in trying this out.=C2=A0
I am working in the Medical Industry where crypto is pretty importa= nt and so am looking to run this between mobile devices and the servers.
I run golang on mobiles now.

Is there any = impediment to running n Android and IOS ?

I can al= so try to help with the code. I worked in security but not really crypto.

Regards

Joe (Berlin)
=

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 = at 7:49 AM James Tucker <jftucker@= gmail.com> wrote:
I have more in a local repo, but it's very= disorganized as I'm taking a more "port" approach with the i= nternal structures right now. After some discussions with Jason it seemed I= wasn't keeping up enough with some of the important internal behaviors= . Once this port approach is a little further along I'll be able to car= ve out meaningful individual pieces with tests for submitting.

If you w= anted something sooner, cobbling together the uapi code I have in wireguard= -go, with the implementation stuff in go-wireguard would probably work rela= tively more quickly than I'll finish off, but the end goal I have is a = little cleaner than what that would be.

I don't suspect I hav= e a ton of work to do, but mostly it's finding the time to sit down and= make decent chunks of progress, as my day to day is quite full. If you or = others are ready to lay down some time, I'd be more than willing to pus= h up pieces earlier and/or coordinate.

If I don't catch up wi= th the ML soon enough, feel free to highlight me in irc and/or reach out to= me over other mediums. I don't keep up with this email too well when I= 'm this busy.

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at= 6:53 AM, Joe Blue <joeblew99@gm= ail.com> wrote:
Thanks.

Seems= this is the git endpojnt:=C2=A0https://git.zx2c4.com/wire= guard-go/about/

<= /div>
In the toDO there is a fair bit there. Is it = ready for me to be able to work on anything or still very bare bones ?





On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at= 1:34 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
Hello Joe,

I defer to James Tucker, CCd, to describe the status of his implementation.=

Regards,
Jason

--001a113b0b6247247e054bd9516a--