From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F017C433DB for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E344D64F84 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232799AbhBCSys (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:54:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56046 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229683AbhBCSyN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:54:13 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD06C0613D6; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:53:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id q7so385824wre.13; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 10:53:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hCI6ZiNImno66RrVehBGLrYLxtapcVm5zzLIRSnM/WU=; b=VCJ3330ilMlz+QT2OkDv5eR7bQwxwP0yJ4r1r8eJsgHMjJ4mxac6onJBjDTVewEAfM diCPP7S02OhDsvmYqjgXAQNgAT6ONwiqutI/wpFQJwODGEkQi8Rpxx3+aMu/v5rkwQ1K 45o2B+snceo73W6d6J014W8pBSQ0p7DLFKxbtZT9EEQzRft4f0AVfA5sBCmfgTlpCJJV y9/CGdMTWRA1Og+Lu/BYKrPGAgFBPZ0X3T8CBXUugd26gfroT2zpWJXg44RjxtBBjLb5 pkDo417TWzy3ABdFkyjkU/vjhEVXOGC5GYv3cR8DdEBN4pkGA9LFw7qMilUoL4B+V9nr Hpaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hCI6ZiNImno66RrVehBGLrYLxtapcVm5zzLIRSnM/WU=; b=e3kLRVaGmec4HfwTywG5bNHz+YR3NTBGoerezmXKov5evIYZAWmYaZiizCkinhUn+O 4FWXFSh60jxO8gS0LBg6kT9OqCNQ30viS3NhlQfoBmThwzixvZC2pBNpcQCSXRmDiOOd yg0Q02vLnnAuESujjGfk82gSowjzDjpHV/EEEj9YZi+66RLu80yk8doaBSAuhwJjjbzn SdkHegV3avhFnKcRUydXXbQ3/6D0r/OwymiaZIqQCvwZgQUHPTO2DO+2369dbu/+1NFS kdXwZfPklFcZGlkIk0wOZGI4NmzPfKNK33uPRt/QHa6hIC29ApT1iWanJyqnSDfctwzU Qt7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300CAEzvXCM6NQrd9ETjvolljHzGG9MuuAMdppMThmeYWnVp7Cm D0YyqtYuqoTI5+XKP6WSyHUmMPaPnBcfhoX+pYs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHLzSa0ru1ema9q6kVyMifJqigYStPu+h+0FBA1tpzSHcRislqBSWzhsMgmuJKF7sU+drOE/JpGjgTQCLonYE= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ed02:: with SMTP id a2mr5098155wro.197.1612378411971; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 10:53:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210129195240.31871-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> <20210129195240.31871-3-TheSven73@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Sven Van Asbroeck Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:53:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets To: Bryan Whitehead Cc: Microchip Linux Driver Support , David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , Alexey Denisov , Sergej Bauer , Tim Harvey , =?UTF-8?Q?Anders_R=C3=B8nningen?= , netdev , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thank you Bryan. I will prepare a v2 early next week. Would Microchip be able to donate some time to test v2? My own tests are certainly not perfect. Various stress tests across architectures (intel/arm) would help create confidence in the multi-buffer frame implementation. Perhaps Microchip has various test rigs already set up? After all, absence of bugs is more important than speed improvements.