All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
	<letux-kernel@openphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SPI broken for SPI based panel drivers
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:34:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGngYiWWKOGvMUUXYqkvGVntCjhkG+BJ_JCTSWzrer4P9woSTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYf2dUF6PjYcvnsKDPoxXPWiWKKAqpik4-2AAQjRmatfw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Linus,

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 9:20 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> I don't know if much can be done about it other than
> having better programmers than me at the task. Or
> less tired when they write the patch. etc.

I don't think that we have many programmers that are
better than you :)

IMHO the fundamental dilemma is between features,
security and agility on the one hand, and stability on
the other. Too much emphasis on stability, and one
ends up with a system which is hard to change, i.e.
improve or keep secure. A system like that runs the
real risk of being rapidly overtaken by a more nimble
alternative.

More testing is good and will make breakages rarer,
but I guess we need to be realistic here and realize
that even with a huge community effort, we might
never get 100% or even 80% test coverage.

But to be honest these sound like questions for the
Greg KHs and Torvaldses of this world, not for me.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-01 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 19:03 [BUG] SPI broken for SPI based panel drivers H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-11-30 20:13 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-30 20:22   ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01  8:59   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 12:16     ` Mark Brown
2020-12-01 14:05       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 14:20         ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-01 14:34           ` Sven Van Asbroeck [this message]
2020-12-01 14:35           ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 15:52             ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 16:46               ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:10             ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 16:39               ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:53                 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 17:10                   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 18:43                     ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-02 12:19                       ` Mark Brown
2020-12-04 10:08                       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-04 13:46                         ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-04 16:49                           ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-04 19:19                             ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-04 21:31                               ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-05  0:25                             ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-05  7:04                               ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-09  8:04                                 ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-12-09  8:40                                   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-09  8:38                                 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-09  8:45                                   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 22:51                     ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-01 16:44               ` [Letux-kernel] " Andreas Kemnade
2020-12-01 16:51                 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:52                 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:55                 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 16:20           ` Mark Brown
2020-12-01 16:41             ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 17:11               ` Mark Brown
2020-12-01 12:41     ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 13:32       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 14:08         ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 15:33           ` Mark Brown
2020-12-05 20:57   ` Pavel Machek
2020-12-07 13:43     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGngYiWWKOGvMUUXYqkvGVntCjhkG+BJ_JCTSWzrer4P9woSTA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=thesven73@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=hns@goldelico.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.