From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756436AbaIIMPw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:15:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:43529 "EHLO mail-ig0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752908AbaIIMPu (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:15:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <540EE4B0.70207@ti.com> References: <1410203998-8700-1-git-send-email-mugunthanvnm@ti.com> <20140908193440.GC12150@kahuna> <540EE4B0.70207@ti.com> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 07:15:49 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4RWa7I7dHVPHbax9Yd8GQbabMDU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [resend PATCH 0/3] Add DRA7xx CPSW Ethernet support in Device Tree From: Nishanth Menon To: Mugunthan V N Cc: Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , dt list , linux-omap , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote: > >> Sorry this is now blocked inside TI. could you explain the testing done >> for sleep state? did you attempt sleep mode before testing this? >> > > I have not tested sleep mode, just tested boot and ping test. I must NAK then for the reason that this is a patch that is just build tested and is not tested for the feature it claims to introduce. -- --- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [resend PATCH 0/3] Add DRA7xx CPSW Ethernet support in Device Tree Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 07:15:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1410203998-8700-1-git-send-email-mugunthanvnm@ti.com> <20140908193440.GC12150@kahuna> <540EE4B0.70207@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <540EE4B0.70207-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mugunthan V N Cc: Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , dt list , linux-omap , lkml List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote: > >> Sorry this is now blocked inside TI. could you explain the testing done >> for sleep state? did you attempt sleep mode before testing this? >> > > I have not tested sleep mode, just tested boot and ping test. I must NAK then for the reason that this is a patch that is just build tested and is not tested for the feature it claims to introduce. -- --- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html