Re: [PATCH 3/4] input: sirfsoc-onkey - use dev_get_drvdata instead of platform_get_drvdata

[Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>]

2014-02-13 15:24 GMT+08:00 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:40:23PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> From: Xianglong Du <Xianglong.Du@csr.com>
>>
>> In resume entry, use dev_get_drvdata() instead of to_platform_device(dev) +
>> platform_get_drvdata(pdev).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianglong Du <Xianglong.Du@csr.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c |    3 +--
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c
>> index 097c10a..8e45bf11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c
>> @@ -157,8 +157,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_pwrc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>  static int sirfsoc_pwrc_resume(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>> -     struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> -     struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata *pwrcdrv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +     struct sirfsoc_pwrc_drvdata *pwrcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> I believe we should use accessors matching the object type. Currently
> dev_get_drvdata and platform_get_drvdata return the same object, but
> they do not have to.
>
> IOW I prefer the original code.

i did see many commits in kernel which did same jobs with this one. e.g:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a1216394e620d0dfbb03c712ae3210e7b77c9e11
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bab8b563ef08455440badca7fe79b2c700bd1b75
...

in my understand, the changed context is a general pm_ops to general
"driver" and not a legacy suspend/resume in "platform_driver" bound
with pdev, so in the context, we are caring about "device" more than
"pdev".

how do you think if i do a more change in probe() with this by:

- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwrcdrv);
+ dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, pwrcdrv);

would this make everything look fine?

>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry

-barry