From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Heylen <heyleke@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:00:08 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/4] toolchain: wrap 'ld' with
	toolchain-wrapper
In-Reply-To: <816e611d-747b-6e15-5aea-1d83f246c43e@imgtec.com>
References: <1459885521-25434-1-git-send-email-heyleke@gmail.com>
 <20161016120510.55c138f0@free-electrons.com>
 <CAGszK3i9-JcnWFeHaydg+oA8ntPb=Gb+a9UKsHXUNQyV8JUUGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161016142837.62bc74ba@free-electrons.com>
 <816e611d-747b-6e15-5aea-1d83f246c43e@imgtec.com>
Message-ID: <CAGszK3jRhWPP=mxaQTx8kjYjyrymktU4V0NDPp+bxAk40o5zRQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

For our platform (mips octeon 64 bit but with 32bit userspace:
-mabi=n32), and indeed because of the usage of LD, the compilation
does fail, that is why I added the patches.

br,

Jan

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera
<Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> have you recently seen the dmalloc package failing because of using the
> wrong emulation in ld? Or because using ld instead of gcc for linking,
> in general?
>
> Indeed it uses ld instead of gcc, and that's something that could be
> improved upstream. However, since it's not failing to build for us I
> think there is nothing we need to fix in Buildroot.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vincent.
>
> On 16/10/16 14:28, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 13:36:19 +0200, Jan Heylen wrote:
>>> So we should fix libdmalloc as well?
>>
>> Vicente is working on this. Do you have references to autobuilder
>> failures on libdmalloc caused by this problem ?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Thomas
>>