Hi Anibal, On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM Anibal Limon wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:31, Anibal Limon > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:29, Guillaume Tucker < >> guillaume.tucker@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> FYI I've sent an API token to Anibal with only HTTP GET permissions. >>> >> >> Right, I tested it for my personal usage and works, thanks Guillaume. >> >> I requested a token for read/write over qcom-lt/jobs. >> > > Hi Guillaume, > > Any update on get a token for r/w on qcom-lt/jobs? > Could you please explain what you and the Qualcomm Landing Team intend to do with this token? In principle it seems fine to have a non-LAVA lab provide some KernelCI test results, but it would be good to have it explained on this mailing list so we're all aware of what this involves. Best wishes, Guillaume > >> Regards, >> Anibal >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:16 PM Anibal Limon >>> wrote: >>> >>>> + Milo >>>> + info at kernelci.org >>>> >>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 03:13, Milosz Wasilewski < >>>> milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 01:37, Anibal Limon >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I want to access the KernelCI API to get information about the >>>>> QCOMLT builds, I have a couple of questions, >>>>> > >>>>> > What is the process to get a KernelCI API auth token? >>>>> >>>>> I guess asking the ML is a good start. Back in the days when Milo was >>>>> working on the code I got one directly from him. I'm not sure who is >>>>> generating tokens these days. >>>>> >>>>> milosz >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > Fathi, Anmar, >>>>> > Do we have a KernelCI auth token available on LinaroCI? >>>>> > >>>>> > Regards, >>>>> > Anibal >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>