On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 6:02 AM Czarnowski, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 23.12.2021 02:01, Czarnowski, Przemyslaw wrote:
> On 20.12.2021 13:54, Czarnowski, Przemyslaw wrote:
>>
>> I plan to start pushing changes here this week.
>>
> Replying to myself, but just pushed a series of first 4 patches to review.
>
> It is just a skeleton (infrastructure to build main flows on) but wanted
> to get the first reviews for initial changes (transition from old
> content to the new one in particular).
>

I would like to rise the request for new service of Virtual Media
repository once again.

Recently I've made an attempt to push VM service patches once again
after UT has been added. In the meantime, I've noticed that in order to
make a graceful transition between old and new solution the final switch
between the old and new code should be made at the moment when the last
patch is accepted.

There are two main reason why I would like to recall the discussion.
First is the voice of the maintainer of the old service.

What does "voice" mean in the above?  Can you elaborate on the problem, and give some specific examples (ideally links to the gerrit reviews)?
 
Second -
problems with linting and CI which wants to build and test both projects
simultaneously.

Same thing here, can you give specific examples?  The linting is just enforcing the coding standard, and testing two executables at the same time is something many other repositories do.
 

Of course the decision does not belong to me. I just do not want mess
with current CI to support this transitional state.

My opinion still remains the same, let's keep everything in one repository.  If you need help in CI to do that, let's talk about the specific things that are blocking, and we can go from there.
 

--
Best regards,
Przemyslaw Czarnowski