From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431BEC433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 20:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Kxsky56Prz3cMs for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 06:11:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=QYmEXp/X; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::336; helo=mail-wm1-x336.google.com; envelope-from=edtanous@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=QYmEXp/X; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Kxsk21nMGz3bqK for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 06:10:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id n126-20020a1c2784000000b0038e8af3e788so195857wmn.1 for ; Mon, 09 May 2022 13:10:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=emf7WA3+RrnvmBeTcXtGLseEQRpCBrBgnRTGTmaZQ6A=; b=QYmEXp/XCzR1BrmAJThTvatAenBWCFay4e3Q8c+mlVJS8jt328pJvb7aepvEIbCxb8 uKL5ynZltI1GCPlmk+rpGoQdk1MDLeaCEfjdiA+t2WlM5JCkOQIl0mfEWy+xV2w+E+zT FybTN9LVqDuaE86XPpMz0FehckFTi+UYdfKxa701YD8wQjbR6uBquWBHzBd9uKm+DZxW ZWjRcnsuvQwO1T0L8id2dioz1UY7BwIrps4XqtQPWsqJor8puNKErjMzWRCvHgtwkZGU waFF4H4nXodxaJ1ix+WzFEYU1IlpdgcMIAxUlTxzIeOKRKKo9CHorrOxghzelD7nAybP Pv+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=emf7WA3+RrnvmBeTcXtGLseEQRpCBrBgnRTGTmaZQ6A=; b=wcJohe2OuqaIjjd4ozibO+2SkYTvM5uOc/+0OT+1LvNQfWjR2r8X/oYGAgroFBrYS2 EGTZYclILDCmTMmyX6c9SSTTQkH8lVSuBQeLPIThjONcZrnxqhXvDCjP+SQu0PwO9+gX nxH4YI9DxKzQgsTe+FsSs0ix5kVV1Jb93ZJv6tApwVgSA86HzmQTIJ1fnbseZ+IrgTyt txw+T6qYAMzTrc1yRvvfdysghIdIP4Kq/JS2yfuyGLYxMgqh7bQ6C9CP7KNJuhKDFJyQ axC9ftRDHJRjEjfY9MUfex64c1mMvqyHcWR9rxj0oO8ELMRcoAEu/xA7W7K1qwZbL7Br ty6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312Shx0CRXDfc/JqyunFwrCDHhFNZlK3RZ8L5o1ShAe6x38k495 v2408ZgOVo+D6rEKpArkMsJ+TF2pUyCiLXoANjrgdg9bdOXFaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy91Fq2/Udt63GgW6ejSbNml9nP/J5ZQQHJTknJRkg3YbCU851pYvDoR6G8v+auycL6tyx1smQmClNZz7sryvA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1151:b0:394:6816:d4f2 with SMTP id z17-20020a05600c115100b003946816d4f2mr23555182wmz.195.1652127046802; Mon, 09 May 2022 13:10:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <16ba58d6-d06b-1c92-340b-e94119a47708@linux.intel.com> <3ae639dc-720b-49ba-ad07-879a009db144@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3ae639dc-720b-49ba-ad07-879a009db144@www.fastmail.com> From: Ed Tanous Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 13:10:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running OpenBMC Daemons/Applications as non root using D-Bus Session/User Bus. To: Andrew Jeffery Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, Nirav Shah , nirav.j2.shah@intel.com Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 4:47 PM Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > > On Tue, 3 May 2022, at 21:32, Patrick Williams wrote: > > I think you'll find it hard to enumerate because our architecture is > > purposefully very flat. I know the codebase fairly well and have thought > > about it for a bit and can only come up with one: kcsbridge (or btbridge). > > IMO both kcsbridged and btbridged should be deleted and the > functionality folded into phosphor-host-ipmid. The split that we have > there is not useful or efficient. +1 > > In terms of what Patrick spoke about, that means even fewer examples. > > Andrew