From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54C1DDA8.5040103@sandeen.net> References: <54C1DDA8.5040103@sandeen.net> From: Steve French Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:09:27 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: xfstest generic/299 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: Eric Sandeen Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" List-ID: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/22/15 11:23 PM, Steve French wrote: >> Noticed test generic/299 failing over NFS (v4.1 dialect) with the error >> >> "[not run] /usr/bin/fio too old" >> >> fio-2.1.11 version (which is what is installed on current Ubuntu) is >> presumably not too old > > Well, 2.1.11 was released 16-Jul-2014 > > fio is up to 2.2.5 now, so it sure could be. I updated to 2.2.5-3 (cloning and building from the repository on git.kernel.org) which did not seem to change the results. > The test sets up a config file, and tries to run fio against it; > if it fails, it's deemed "too old" > > And _require_fio dumps to $seqres.full, > > $FIO_PROG --warnings-fatal --showcmd $job >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > [ $? -eq 0 ] || _notrun "$FIO_PROG too old, see $seqres.full" > > so what does 299.full look like? min value out of range: 0 (1 min) fio: failed parsing filesize=0 fio: job global dropped fio --ioengine=libaio --bs=128k --directory=/mnt1/scratch --size=999G --iodepth=128*1 --continue_on_error=write --ignore_error=,ENOSPC --error_dump=0 --create_on_open=1 --fallocate=none --exitall=1 -- Thanks, Steve