From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0947CC433E0 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9822086A for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="vQcflc2Y" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729616AbgHFQwB (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:52:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729508AbgHFQvD (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:51:03 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com (mail-io1-xd44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 717FCC0086AB; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id z6so50062328iow.6; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:31:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T9d2cPoZwDqNGPTOF/xh+MxXI5gE97qXPjeblukEaaA=; b=vQcflc2YsOmgW2sQjngcKtZEcaKtv5UkXvVETU5hbzK6g0ksH2yEr8GcVsuKfRcpsR EFW2Dxuq+ZVOurLvqdJcInXpyTCS4D5zF0d9Gu1tWjyu6PSFcwzbHQoqPL9cVwSsVT4I THCWUNf3YKvfZhJG/jaBUwiX7vn+TLoxKzj33KMkHw2AABschis+j1bRkvEk6gvGBOHV gvNx8YOSEbBcBQO5NDwNosSImG3Jg9yxf3z87RhWVJkfTQPlHDuICSpTDX08c+rws8ZR CF51+6gtwtvDWoSteC6vZ2C3x6k1f+8j9/p1QeDxVSxuOZR4yvDnu+NtziMwVpVpauNa ccJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T9d2cPoZwDqNGPTOF/xh+MxXI5gE97qXPjeblukEaaA=; b=hqdq/N9R+HxJtnC0gmqQqmjbRwVIvD6kdQyW7TYK3MSFQ7HXxZJGYfu+9p+bhREK1f qAQm5XykoW1arwnS628T5Wit3j10ZyYf9XfOoaTkbZelx8KwZm9F0W5MF6lWb1vsLUMz P2UoCX0zmQmsoveZbQWx0gtzyVt+ee2RFzqD/qFPV05lU+fSFxDjOEduUa+8tzekPIcz 7Ncr0p00plsqlVFlBEpDU2zXa6YRp71WNtKOpJ/FBGUnjKf7ulErUeXZDDqPLyX/MnMx BdqVFmICzacH3aj4yplVv4aM/AuDsRHV+JYdbA/CN+7wo43+mEqA390MVF91e1Yhd4E0 A3ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D7Eieg7u1InwFawT4WT7LwwKCy0RapBJrQh6/tW9EeQ2BbDk2 KZ4d4atOpGkM6eg4Q2qJ6NXVGmwTwpdeQhOiHsSQ8Yoo X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmjtu3I9LpJ7xxUqAWkEMGb6vq1m8lbFSQ4AwTzFSkP9twdx78ZCkmV7yKZa1BLk2PvG5WRWqNadBbvjcTUho= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d80e:: with SMTP id l14mr10808869iok.65.1596727904697; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:31:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200806164505.0eada105@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200806164505.0eada105@canb.auug.org.au> From: Steve French Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:31:33 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cifs tree To: Stephen Rothwell , Dan Carpenter Cc: CIFS , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Dan, I just fixed the Author tag in this patch to match your email address but seems like the author email address gets mangled when sent through some mailing lists. Any ideas how to avoid this. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:45 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Commit > > 2676d210d2f4 ("cifs: Fix an error pointer dereference in cifs_mount()") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. > > This is only pisked up by my script because of the mangling of the email > sender address by the mailing list it passed through. I guess a little > more care is required to make sure the author attribution is correct in > this case. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell -- Thanks, Steve