From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve French Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] cifs: Fix xattr name checks Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:49:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20160413182026.GR25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1460586620-5717-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <1460586620-5717-2-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <20160414043718.GS25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , Steve French , "linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org To: Al Viro Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: If you prefer merging those out of your tree, you can add my Reviewed-by if needed (for the three cifs patches) On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Steve French wrote: > If you are planning to merge it in next few weeks (they fix bugs, and > are safe so why not), I can simply just back out my changes from > cifs-2.6.git for-next branch and let you merge the trivial checkpatch > cleanup attached. > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Viro wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:26:24PM -0500, Steve French wrote: >>> Thanks for spotting this - merged into cifs-2.6.git. checkpatch >>> spotted and old indentation issue so I cleaned that up in a followon >>> patch that I will send. >> >> *ugh* >> >> And in the meanwhile I'd picked those into my queue... Could you put that >> stuff on a separate branch so that both cifs-2.6.git and vfs.git could >> merge it? > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve -- Thanks, Steve From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve French Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/8] cifs: Fix xattr name checks In-Reply-To: References: <20160413182026.GR25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1460586620-5717-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <1460586620-5717-2-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <20160414043718.GS25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you prefer merging those out of your tree, you can add my Reviewed-by if needed (for the three cifs patches) On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Steve French wrote: > If you are planning to merge it in next few weeks (they fix bugs, and > are safe so why not), I can simply just back out my changes from > cifs-2.6.git for-next branch and let you merge the trivial checkpatch > cleanup attached. > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Viro wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:26:24PM -0500, Steve French wrote: >>> Thanks for spotting this - merged into cifs-2.6.git. checkpatch >>> spotted and old indentation issue so I cleaned that up in a followon >>> patch that I will send. >> >> *ugh* >> >> And in the meanwhile I'd picked those into my queue... Could you put that >> stuff on a separate branch so that both cifs-2.6.git and vfs.git could >> merge it? > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve -- Thanks, Steve