From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerome Glisse Subject: Re: VM lockdep warning Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:08:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4F92A9AA.4030607@vodafone.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com (mail-pb0-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7469E75C for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcun4 with SMTP id un4so2348119pbc.36 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F92A9AA.4030607@vodafone.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_K=F6nig?= Cc: dri-devel List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org 2012/4/21 Christian K=F6nig : > Interesting, I'm pretty sure that I haven't touched the locking order of = the > cs_mutex vs. vm_mutex. > > Maybe it is just some kind of side effect, going to locking into it anywa= y. > > Christian. > It's the using, init path take lock in different order than cs path Cheers, Jerome