Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: notify hypervisor about guest entering s2idle state

[Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>]

czw., 9 cze 2022 o 16:27 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> On 6/9/22 04:03, Grzegorz Jaszczyk wrote:
> > Co-developed-by: Peter Fang <peter.fang@intel.corp-partner.google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Fang <peter.fang@intel.corp-partner.google.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.corp-partner.google.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/hypercalls.rst | 7 +++++++
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                        | 3 +++
> >  drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c                 | 8 ++++++++
> >  include/linux/suspend.h                   | 1 +
> >  include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h             | 1 +
> >  kernel/power/suspend.c                    | 4 ++++
> >  6 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> What's the deal with these emails?
>
>         zide.chen@intel.corp-partner.google.com
>
> I see a smattering of those in the git logs, but never for Intel folks.

I've kept emails as they were in the original patch and I do not think
I should change them. This is what Zide and Peter originally used.

>
> I'll also say that I'm a bit suspicious of a patch that includes 5
> authors for 24 lines of code.  Did it really take five of you to write
> 24 lines of code?

This patch was built iteratively: original patch comes from Zide and
Peter, I've squashed it with Tomasz later changes and reworked by
myself for upstream. I didn't want to take credentials from any of the
above so ended up with Zide as an author and 3 co-developers. Please
let me know if that's an issue.

Best regards,
Grzegorz