From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AB4C47092 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 02:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50D596023F for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 02:46:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 50D596023F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=midokura.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58042 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnXwX-0001JT-CV for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 22:46:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnXvf-0000aW-KY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 22:45:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]:45594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnXvb-00089l-UA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 22:45:23 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id q15so7238139pgg.12 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:45:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=midokura.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kYDjop2Q8s/vp7Ihzf0icChQU1L7hEV0pDG5TQ0MNCI=; b=eAys3XQKWwmWvw41Jc5FY7M7C6fCQWibWyk13xJesw4kI543/XlF1Nd7GCu/ASPxTz 4pZLr1epqx56y2QiU+sMb++hqKBKJ5qV0/2ddiZD0S93I3s/bc9X8AYyTinVHDlnNn4E PZV31GNtsRpVxezwTHoOqhC2F+wcguz8kJIOk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kYDjop2Q8s/vp7Ihzf0icChQU1L7hEV0pDG5TQ0MNCI=; b=EbIyvvUyTV42/RdN+nUgubtrmJl3f72e0s0e9lFwmF6IsukvjmzjBLopSWxlglJMJh fN1XQ45gOKUfGm6/wB5nyXvdM7xil2ZbdDx1w/5KLhU5buqiLFf3ScDex0LyR0DayBkv ng9ntTNAyPH45gPRkTbcjfI9c8hVmgtEhvoUwWOkJVLw/BPZAqr6904J4mfGscJck32x I/isCEnnmlC+zGKGP0UJUiy6QtUhUCepZ+izD1q/VwIqAxbq34Y0ssMjVjmMCcLcgDR9 9fH6fbBvCjDOvETJzU/PiFRXYNSgjTtT2JUb0enibZ+xAlpRNsXeOygiw0FfIZnbcdz2 loWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TihbCmYTH5rzdhom/hwMoqMfmT0ZxMZLfu3ObM4EGr2s9JP6l +Fft8YIXF7TQvBPCy4fengZeYu5hugBHG8sGD10ZBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEV0N3IHpx7/2Tb1AIRW4PZCoZ3tuPal0ypnwyrl2+knSoxG9PGqqQqqNa3o1DJ/HLcwyoqP6jS2N2ggPvDTs= X-Received: by 2002:a65:624e:: with SMTP id q14mr20349332pgv.103.1622429117573; Sun, 30 May 2021 19:45:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210524045412.15152-1-yamamoto@midokura.com> <87cztg3tv0.fsf@linaro.org> <87y2c01f7j.fsf@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <87y2c01f7j.fsf@linaro.org> From: Takashi Yamamoto Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 11:45:06 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user changes to run docker To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::532; envelope-from=yamamoto@midokura.com; helo=mail-pg1-x532.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:25 PM Alex Benn=C3=A9e = wrote: > > > Takashi Yamamoto writes: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:22 AM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:49 AM Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > YAMAMOTO Takashi writes: > >> > > >> > > These patches, along with a few more hacks [1] I didn't include > >> > > in this patchset, allowed me to run arm64 and armv7 version of > >> > > dind image on amd64. > >> > > > >> > > [1] https://github.com/yamt/qemu/tree/linux-user-for-docker > >> > > >> > Might be worth posting those patches next time (even if they have a = RFC > >> > or !MERGE in the title for now). > >> > >> ok. > > > > while RFC is mentioned in eg. git format-patch --help, > > i couldn't find what !MERGE is. > > can you provide a reference? > > It's usually just an annotation to the subject line of the commit, e.g: > > foo/bar: hacky fix to frobulator (!MERGE) > > rest of commit message > > or something like: > > baz/quack: invert the tachyon beam (WIP) > > reason for the fix. > > [AJB: still WIP as this breaks foo] > > AFAIK the only subject lines supported by the tooling are the squash: > and fixup: prefixes. > > > is there a nice way to express that some patches in a post are meant > > for application and the others are RFC? > > Aside from a description in the cover letter not really. The main reason > to include patches that aren't ready for merging is to show where your > work is going so the full context of earlier changes can be seen. Having > an ALL CAPS tag in the subject line is just handy for the maintainer > when scanning what might get cherry picked. Obviously if a patch totally > breaks the build it's not worth including as it just makes review harder > when giving the patches a spin so you should exercise your judgement. ok. thank you for the explanation. > > -- > Alex Benn=C3=A9e