From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net 2/2] ipmr,ip6mr: call list_del_rcu() when deleting mr table from list Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:17:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1427310345-29829-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1427310345-29829-2-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1427314022.3581245.245236665.477D7858@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1427314914.3584424.245242065.67DE2EEE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1427317004.3592779.245256885.395A5939@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1427331669.3644952.245320733.5C7B84E1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1427372619.2762618.245521141.61D660A6@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Cong Wang , netdev To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:37378 "EHLO mail-ig0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753477AbbCaARG (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:17:06 -0400 Received: by igcxg11 with SMTP id xg11so4038403igc.0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:17:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1427372619.2762618.245521141.61D660A6@webmail.messagingengine.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > > The rest of the locking seems to be fine. So only rcu_read_lock() is > missing for lockdep correctness. > Since DaveM already marks this as "Changes requested", I will: 1) separate patch 1/2 out for net and possibly stable; 2) fold patch 2/2 into a more complete patch including the rcu_read_lock() you mentioned, only for net-next. Thanks!