From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Ford Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] TI Bluetooth serdev support Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 06:33:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170405183005.20570-1-robh@kernel.org> <20170430160430.rmyuo6sdrkrjxjg6@earth> <20170509044837.oje2tfodytyuuuur@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Baruch Siach , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Johan Hedberg , Gustavo Padovan , Marcel Holtmann , Sebastian Reichel , Wei Xu , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , Eyal Reizer , netdev , Satish Patel , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" To: Rob Herring Return-path: Received: from mail-ua0-f196.google.com ([209.85.217.196]:48862 "EHLO mail-ua0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751029AbdJ1LeA (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:34:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Adam Ford wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:12:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Adam Ford wrote: >>>> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>>> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:14:20AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote: >>>> >>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> >>> > This series adds serdev support to the HCI LL protocol used on TI BT >>>> >>> > modules and enables support on HiKey board with with the WL1835 module. >>>> >>> > With this the custom TI UIM daemon and btattach are no longer needed. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Without UIM daemon, what instruction do you use to load the BT firmware? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I was thinking 'hciattach' but I was having trouble. I was hoping you >>>> >>> might have some insight. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> hciattach -t 30 -s 115200 /dev/ttymxc1 texas 3000000 flow Just >>>> >>> returns a timeout. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I modified my i.MX6 device tree per the binding documentation and >>>> >>> setup the regulators and enable GPIO pins. >>>> >> >>>> >> If you configured everything correctly no userspace interaction is >>>> >> required. The driver should request the firmware automatically once >>>> >> you power up the bluetooth device. >>>> >> >>>> >> Apart from DT changes make sure, that the following options are >>>> >> enabled and check dmesg for any hints. >>>> >> >>>> >> CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS >>>> >> CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT >>>> >> CONFIG_BT_HCIUART >>>> >> CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL >>>> > >>>> > I have enabled those flags, and I have updated my device tree. >>>> > I am testing this on an OMAP3630 (DM3730) board with a WL1283. I am >>>> > getting a lot of timeout errors. I tested this against the original >>>> > implemention I had in pdata-quirks.c using the ti-st driver, uim & and >>>> > the btwilink driver. >>>> > >>>> > I pulled in some of the newer patches to enable the wl1283-st, but I >>>> > am obviously missing something. >>>> > >>>> > I 58.717651] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading TI version information failed >>>> > (-110) >>>> > [ 58.724853] Bluetooth: hci0: download firmware failed, retrying... >>>> > [ 60.957641] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x1001 tx timeout >>>> > [ 68.957641] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading TI version information failed >>>> > (-110) >>>> > [ 68.964843] Bluetooth: hci0: download firmware failed, retrying... >>>> > [ 69.132171] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 06 >>>> > [ 69.138244] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 0c >>>> > [ 69.143249] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 40 >>>> > [ 69.148498] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 20 >>>> > [ 69.153533] Bluetooth: Data length is too large >>>> > [ 69.158569] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type a0 >>>> > [ 69.163574] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 00 >>>> > [ 69.168731] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 00 >>>> > [ 69.173736] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 34 >>>> > [ 69.178924] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 91 >>>> > [ 71.197631] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x1001 tx timeout >>>> > [ 79.197662] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading TI version information failed (-110) >>>> >>>> There's a bug in serdev_device_write(), so if you have that function >>>> you need either the fix I sent or the patch to make >>>> serdev_device_writebuf atomic again. Both are on the linux-serial >>>> list, but not in any tree yet. >>> >>> You refer to the patches below, right? >>> >>> [PATCH] tty: serdev: fix serdev_device_write return value, >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg26117.html >>> >>> [PATCH] serdev: Restore serdev_device_write_buf for atomic context, >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg26113.html >> >> Yes, either one will fix the issue. > > I am finally getting back to testing these on my DM3730 board, since > it appears most of the patches appear upstream. I am having trouble > remembering how to load this. > > # modprobe hci_uart > [ 31.639892] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22 > [ 31.643890] NET: Registered protocol family 31 > [ 31.648559] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized > [ 31.655975] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized > [ 31.661315] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized > [ 31.667175] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized > [ 31.700408] Bluetooth: HCI UART driver ver 2.3 > [ 31.705108] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol H4 registered > [ 31.710632] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol BCSP registered > [ 31.716217] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol Three-wire (H5) registered > # > > Unfortunately, any attempt to access the HCI device (ie hciconfig up > hci0) fail. > > I have those configs enabled: > CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS > CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT > CONFIG_BT_HCIUART > CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL > > I can see that sysfs shows new files appear: > > /sys/class/bluetooth > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp@68000000/serial@4806c000/bluetooth > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp@68000000/serial@4806c000/bluetooth/compatible > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp@68000000/serial@4806c000/bluetooth/enable-gpios > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp@68000000/serial@4806c000/bluetooth/name > > (and more) > So it appears to me like it has loaded, and I don't see any errors during load. > > Since this worked under pdata quirks and the older shared transport > driver and UIM, I'm sure it's software and not hardware. I just can't > figure out what I am missing. > Nevermind. Sorry for the noise, I got past this part. I had a typo in my device tree. > thanks > > adam >> >> Rob From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aford173@gmail.com (Adam Ford) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 06:33:58 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] TI Bluetooth serdev support In-Reply-To: References: <20170405183005.20570-1-robh@kernel.org> <20170430160430.rmyuo6sdrkrjxjg6@earth> <20170509044837.oje2tfodytyuuuur@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Adam Ford wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:12:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Adam Ford wrote: >>>> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>>> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:14:20AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote: >>>> >>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> >>> > This series adds serdev support to the HCI LL protocol used on TI BT >>>> >>> > modules and enables support on HiKey board with with the WL1835 module. >>>> >>> > With this the custom TI UIM daemon and btattach are no longer needed. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Without UIM daemon, what instruction do you use to load the BT firmware? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I was thinking 'hciattach' but I was having trouble. I was hoping you >>>> >>> might have some insight. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> hciattach -t 30 -s 115200 /dev/ttymxc1 texas 3000000 flow Just >>>> >>> returns a timeout. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I modified my i.MX6 device tree per the binding documentation and >>>> >>> setup the regulators and enable GPIO pins. >>>> >> >>>> >> If you configured everything correctly no userspace interaction is >>>> >> required. The driver should request the firmware automatically once >>>> >> you power up the bluetooth device. >>>> >> >>>> >> Apart from DT changes make sure, that the following options are >>>> >> enabled and check dmesg for any hints. >>>> >> >>>> >> CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS >>>> >> CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT >>>> >> CONFIG_BT_HCIUART >>>> >> CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL >>>> > >>>> > I have enabled those flags, and I have updated my device tree. >>>> > I am testing this on an OMAP3630 (DM3730) board with a WL1283. I am >>>> > getting a lot of timeout errors. I tested this against the original >>>> > implemention I had in pdata-quirks.c using the ti-st driver, uim & and >>>> > the btwilink driver. >>>> > >>>> > I pulled in some of the newer patches to enable the wl1283-st, but I >>>> > am obviously missing something. >>>> > >>>> > I 58.717651] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading TI version information failed >>>> > (-110) >>>> > [ 58.724853] Bluetooth: hci0: download firmware failed, retrying... >>>> > [ 60.957641] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x1001 tx timeout >>>> > [ 68.957641] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading TI version information failed >>>> > (-110) >>>> > [ 68.964843] Bluetooth: hci0: download firmware failed, retrying... >>>> > [ 69.132171] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 06 >>>> > [ 69.138244] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 0c >>>> > [ 69.143249] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 40 >>>> > [ 69.148498] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 20 >>>> > [ 69.153533] Bluetooth: Data length is too large >>>> > [ 69.158569] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type a0 >>>> > [ 69.163574] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 00 >>>> > [ 69.168731] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 00 >>>> > [ 69.173736] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 34 >>>> > [ 69.178924] Bluetooth: Unknown HCI packet type 91 >>>> > [ 71.197631] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0x1001 tx timeout >>>> > [ 79.197662] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading TI version information failed (-110) >>>> >>>> There's a bug in serdev_device_write(), so if you have that function >>>> you need either the fix I sent or the patch to make >>>> serdev_device_writebuf atomic again. Both are on the linux-serial >>>> list, but not in any tree yet. >>> >>> You refer to the patches below, right? >>> >>> [PATCH] tty: serdev: fix serdev_device_write return value, >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg26117.html >>> >>> [PATCH] serdev: Restore serdev_device_write_buf for atomic context, >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg26113.html >> >> Yes, either one will fix the issue. > > I am finally getting back to testing these on my DM3730 board, since > it appears most of the patches appear upstream. I am having trouble > remembering how to load this. > > # modprobe hci_uart > [ 31.639892] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22 > [ 31.643890] NET: Registered protocol family 31 > [ 31.648559] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized > [ 31.655975] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized > [ 31.661315] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized > [ 31.667175] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized > [ 31.700408] Bluetooth: HCI UART driver ver 2.3 > [ 31.705108] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol H4 registered > [ 31.710632] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol BCSP registered > [ 31.716217] Bluetooth: HCI UART protocol Three-wire (H5) registered > # > > Unfortunately, any attempt to access the HCI device (ie hciconfig up > hci0) fail. > > I have those configs enabled: > CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS > CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_CTRL_TTYPORT > CONFIG_BT_HCIUART > CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL > > I can see that sysfs shows new files appear: > > /sys/class/bluetooth > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp at 68000000/serial at 4806c000/bluetooth > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp at 68000000/serial at 4806c000/bluetooth/compatible > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp at 68000000/serial at 4806c000/bluetooth/enable-gpios > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ocp at 68000000/serial at 4806c000/bluetooth/name > > (and more) > So it appears to me like it has loaded, and I don't see any errors during load. > > Since this worked under pdata quirks and the older shared transport > driver and UIM, I'm sure it's software and not hardware. I just can't > figure out what I am missing. > Nevermind. Sorry for the noise, I got past this part. I had a typo in my device tree. > thanks > > adam >> >> Rob