From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A850CC433F5 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773A883720; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 13:58:07 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="efRbTsIo"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 42E298373B; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 13:58:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA53836CB for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 13:58:02 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aford173@gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 30so20182274edv.3 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 04:58:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Iq4+JVLMuw7dni3Q6qadh1mJ/HVK2GI+ZluxUbPBZxI=; b=efRbTsIo8FBdDVwY6OtLRyUJYKSWnzlZxzll7KOBZa9YJHHpHIY3B88C0asjiMC7B3 IISoJ8V3WlVJPWLS+W7V6CDIRzKraH1f8FaixeO/no/MdPrU9T66diKi6J1egwA9DfBq X1o0775PAbutLEGoGIsUrx4Sxj638bKpR02mM1fzPGrEFjl2j0y8tDeP7UBIQZ4I8Wky +RJ0M8XXt8eSOwxmBZ2RRuypOQITgol4OiCAG6EUa1Z6ejGWaeDquk9n3srgfipI5M+9 wAl7WXHabXqpnBQ5Z6g9dturRiXzyeh4jAvIDfsHJJOmC/gp+1JSq8ocDXweWg3JfH78 Jt6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Iq4+JVLMuw7dni3Q6qadh1mJ/HVK2GI+ZluxUbPBZxI=; b=Tx9hjlz1sAq7dsmYfM7tH6erfRnCPFWL1Sl6f+tqQlwCEpWhJ3gnyizxSs+aZAclYj vVAL+Zb/MrTNEeGX/dzZcOG5ksOVi1mfiLXoaAJ2hxnRx5ENN6mgt74TtPWXyhXXk6Pt BXjGG52VzLrbntaTUsxWElcTCwB9EER3Ah+XqlLGn9LG58py6VY/5jHY6mMhDfzj0nsl 1ZT1ZywCRUc/MvjrCLeVXfT73yga7Sdhe5mXoKK3CcqJxrVtCRbTpa7FDMLAOi054XRR W/MFleHm63XqG+1viiHp+bVoX09FEOrqCpf4M4FLYSjCy1edNE7vyZ7/TRCg98pA/2/Z 3i1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533P90jv361yY2DQiSbZuXw29Bg25bP2bXCn14n1Z9dvX2fE1u7j SzM55CeQofyvFAuF0kvJbZXm6am+dIswofEF6vA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyriK0iajVDUnfzUZSk6EBENXyZ63z4eP8tlTpSZlIvN4ozQMZSx/P+Eet3xFCuYzr3BYkjqWltj18C928oG90= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:408:: with SMTP id q8mr39705345edv.254.1641560282015; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 04:58:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220107122241.GA10212@optiplex> In-Reply-To: <20220107122241.GA10212@optiplex> From: Adam Ford Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 06:57:51 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found To: Tim Harvey , ZHIZHIKIN Andrey , u-boot , Stefano Babic , Fabio Estevam , Schrempf Frieder , Adam Ford , Marcel Ziswiler , Jagan Teki Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.38 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.38 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 6:22 AM Oliver Graute wrote: > > That would still leave the following boards broken as nobody has > > submitted binman patches for them. These are both maintained by Oliver > > Graute (added to cc): > > imx8qm_rom7720_a1_4G_defconfig > > cgtqmx8_defconfig > > I will look at this. So far I don't know very much about binman. So Can > you point me to similar patches as examples? I can work on this in the > next few days, perhaps I need some hints for this. > > > I believe Stefano is not currently available and I'm not sure when he > > is back to merge the pending binman conversion series. Additionally > > some of these series may need to be rebased (I know I had to do that > > twice because of things being moved to Kconfig) > The series to switch the imx8mq was submitted here. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=268380 I would expect the imx8qm_rom7720_a1_4G_defconfig to be similar. There is another series to unify the binman file generation so it's common to mulitple devices with a siilar SoC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=268510 adam > > Best regards, > > Oliver >