From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Schuberth Subject: Re: git fsck: unreachable vs. dangling Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <552CD4C8.2020700@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Michael J Gruber , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 14 11:28:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhx9D-0005Tw-64 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:28:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752466AbbDNJ2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:28:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:36372 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752081AbbDNJ2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:28:41 -0400 Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so68844595igb.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 02:28:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mOuh7cGnJK3UwXXzgJLBVBdllL8Aq9xOtEpNfDVwKK8=; b=RKIXMw3FSkMo/2F8e1TjaosQmfRL6z1QcdVXTBrVzrGaOqr9nr3y3S6YE7NZUCpzLw PuDGz92qHHdPTqdcVm1aaB/bN6yP2z0TD28AZRX5SWesm1PopEfzvR74uQAo8zi60MWU qxcH+NQE/7dfinvG3otVlWAmAvS1OipBg4M7WnMgHec3so6b/5aGB5InIaT/cBlZwoJP 30JNw/HngP/kqThikOOKIocZVPdNL9HQgfFDfFLENhytLJvlQ08h06msgz7+1AWy487A p2GBH1jSmyB/zzjZw3TpqJBQpefqulYLe2eDn63IQ+fWa2PlFDwEnDdcsvMXTnpCINms 2mag== X-Received: by 10.42.86.12 with SMTP id s12mr24287852icl.47.1429003721147; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 02:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.159.82 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 02:28:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I just visualize commits to be ping-pong balls with strings between > them, and then grab the root of the graph and lift the whole thing > up, while tips of the branches and tags are anchored. Commit A will > be dangling in the wind if you shake the whole thing. I used to have exactly the same visualization in mind, but got confused in between, unsure whether my understanding was correct. As it turns out it is, and when sticking to that visualization everything seems to be consistent in the fsck docs. They could still benefit some more clarification I guess. I'll see if I can come up with something. Thanks again. -- Sebastian Schuberth