From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760949Ab2DKTUd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:33 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:61186 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756034Ab2DKTUb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F85C6D5.6080904@zytor.com> References: <20120401125741.GA7484@p183.telecom.by> <4F78D0BA.9040709@zytor.com> <4F7F1864.8090606@zytor.com> <4F85C6D5.6080904@zytor.com> From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, drepper@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/10/2012 05:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> I know the reason. fcntl(F_NEXT) is one of a proposal of next SUS enhancement. >> >>   http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=149 >> >> nextfd() has a semantics of F_NEXT. >> > > Looking at that bug report, it sounds like that proposal was rejected. ? If I understand correctly, above URL says, latest satatus is Resolution: Accepted As Marked Please see toppest issue summary. Or if I am missing something, can you please point out which line are you seeing? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120401125741.GA7484@p183.telecom.by> <4F78D0BA.9040709@zytor.com> <4F7F1864.8090606@zytor.com> <4F85C6D5.6080904@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, drepper@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:61186 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756034Ab2DKTUb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F85C6D5.6080904@zytor.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/10/2012 05:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> I know the reason. fcntl(F_NEXT) is one of a proposal of next SUS en= hancement. >> >> =A0 http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=3D149 >> >> nextfd() has a semantics of F_NEXT. >> > > Looking at that bug report, it sounds like that proposal was rejected= =2E ? If I understand correctly, above URL says, latest satatus is Resolution: Accepted As Marked Please see toppest issue summary. Or if I am missing something, can you= please point out which line are you seeing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html