From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754058Ab1LZJt7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:49:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:49781 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752647Ab1LZJtw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:49:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <87ty4ss0z4.fsf@prochyra.name> <87ty4qdpna.fsf@prochyra.name> <20111224142028.GA32171@srcf.ucam.org> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:49:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Platform: samsung-laptop: add DMI information for Samsung N150 Plus From: Corentin Chary To: David Herrmann Cc: Matthew Garrett , Andrzej Prochyra , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:28 PM, David Herrmann wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:12:57PM +0000, Andrzej Prochyra wrote: >>> 'acpi_video0' not functional.  Brightness can be controlled through >>> intel_backlight interface.  There are 21 brightness levels and the >>> backlight can be turned off. >> >> If acpi_video0 doesn't work then we either need to work out why it's not >> working or make it vanish completely, so this patch isn't the correct >> approach. > > Just to make clear, intel_backlight isn't working properly either. If > my laptop boots with backlight at 50% then intel_backlight will only > work in the range 0%-50% on my machine. If I use the samsung module to > set it to 100% then  intel_backlight works correctly in the range > 0-100% until next reboot/suspend. > > So I'd recommend staying with the samsung module and disabling the > acpi_backlight entirely. The samsung module is the only backlight > control which works properly. Can I take a look at the DSDT to see how it's broken ? If it's really not functional, then it should be added to the blacklist in video_detect.c -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net