Hi Kevin,

Has this been applied yet? I = don't see any android12-5.10 builds.

-Todd

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:

Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> writes:

> We recently added the android12-5.10 branch. Please add it to kernelci= testing.
>
> repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/c= ommon
> branch: android12-5.10

PR submitted[1].=C2=A0 Adding android12 along with the stable tree(s)

Kevin

[1] https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull= /578

--0000000000006ad16105b8e0bc4b-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Kevin Hilman" Subject: Re: Please add android12-5.10 kernel to kernelci In-Reply-To: References: <7hlfd8mwrm.fsf@baylibre.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:24:22 -0800 Message-ID: <7hr1mlyh2h.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: To: Todd Kjos , Guillaume Tucker Cc: kernelci@groups.io Yes, it was merged a couple days ago. Not sure yet why there haven't been any builds. We did have some infra failures which caused a bit of a build backlog that might have caused this be deep in the queue, but I thought we made it through that backlog. I'll double-check with Guillaume on Monday to see what's going on here. Sorry for the delay, Kevin Todd Kjos writes: > Hi Kevin, > > Has this been applied yet? I don't see any android12-5.10 builds. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Todd Kjos writes: >> >> > We recently added the android12-5.10 branch. Please add it to kernelci >> testing. >> > >> > repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common >> > branch: android12-5.10 >> >> PR submitted[1]. Adding android12 along with the stable tree(s) >> >> Kevin >> >> [1] https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/578 >> From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7hlfd8mwrm.fsf@baylibre.com> <7hr1mlyh2h.fsf@baylibre.com> In-Reply-To: <7hr1mlyh2h.fsf@baylibre.com> From: Todd Kjos Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:56:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please add android12-5.10 kernel to kernelci Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Guillaume Tucker , kernelci@groups.io Hi Kevin, I'm seeing android12-5.10 builds now. Thanks! On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:24 PM Kevin Hilman wrote: > > Yes, it was merged a couple days ago. Not sure yet why there haven't > been any builds. > > We did have some infra failures which caused a bit of a build backlog > that might have caused this be deep in the queue, but I thought we made > it through that backlog. > > I'll double-check with Guillaume on Monday to see what's going on here. > > Sorry for the delay, > > Kevin > > Todd Kjos writes: > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > Has this been applied yet? I don't see any android12-5.10 builds. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > >> Todd Kjos writes: > >> > >> > We recently added the android12-5.10 branch. Please add it to kernelci > >> testing. > >> > > >> > repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common > >> > branch: android12-5.10 > >> > >> PR submitted[1]. Adding android12 along with the stable tree(s) > >> > >> Kevin > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/578 > >> From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Please add android12-5.10 kernel to kernelci References: <7hlfd8mwrm.fsf@baylibre.com> <7hr1mlyh2h.fsf@baylibre.com> From: "Guillaume Tucker" Message-ID: <225a5cb3-5f13-6cb9-cef5-66c471128d41@collabora.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:28:53 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: To: Todd Kjos , Kevin Hilman Cc: kernelci@groups.io On 19/01/2021 17:56, Todd Kjos wrote: > Hi Kevin, I'm seeing android12-5.10 builds now. Thanks! Yes there was a production update earlier today. Changes don't get rolled out automatically when they're merged on GitHub, to avoid transient issues. Typically that happens once a week while builds and tests are paused. Guillaume > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:24 PM Kevin Hilman wrote: >> >> Yes, it was merged a couple days ago. Not sure yet why there haven't >> been any builds. >> >> We did have some infra failures which caused a bit of a build backlog >> that might have caused this be deep in the queue, but I thought we made >> it through that backlog. >> >> I'll double-check with Guillaume on Monday to see what's going on here. >> >> Sorry for the delay, >> >> Kevin >> >> Todd Kjos writes: >> >>> Hi Kevin, >>> >>> Has this been applied yet? I don't see any android12-5.10 builds. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> >>>> Todd Kjos writes: >>>> >>>>> We recently added the android12-5.10 branch. Please add it to kernelci >>>> testing. >>>>> >>>>> repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common >>>>> branch: android12-5.10 >>>> >>>> PR submitted[1]. Adding android12 along with the stable tree(s) >>>> >>>> Kevin >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/578 >>>> From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Todd Kjos Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:27:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Please add/remove android kernels Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000982ee005bf420cba" List-ID: To: kernelci@groups.io, Kevin Hilman --000000000000982ee005bf420cba Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" We recently added some android common kernels and deprecated others. Please add these to kerneci testing: repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common branches: android13-5.10 android12-5.10-lts android11-5.4-lts Please remove these branches (I may have already mentioned some of them): android-3.18-n-release android-4.4-n android-4.4-n-release android-3.18-o-release android-4.4-o-release android-4.9-o-release Thanks, -Todd --000000000000982ee005bf420cba Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We recently added some android common kernels and dep= recated others.

Please add these to kerneci=C2=A0t= esting:

repo: https://android= .googlesource.com/kernel/common

branches:

android13-5.10

android12-5.10-lts

android11-5.4-lts

<= br>

Please remove these= branches (I may have already mentioned some of them):

android-3.18-n-release

android-4.4-n
android-4.4-n-release

android-3.18-o-release

android-4.4-o-release

android-4.9-o-release

Thanks,

-Todd

--000000000000982ee005bf420cba-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Todd Kjos Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:22:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please add/remove android kernels Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: To: kernelci@groups.io, Kevin Hilman Is email still the right way for me to request this sort of thing? Or should I be self-serving by submitting the proposed changes myself? On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 4:27 PM Todd Kjos wrote: > > We recently added some android common kernels and deprecated others. > > Please add these to kerneci testing: > > repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common > branches: > > android13-5.10 > android12-5.10-lts > android11-5.4-lts > > > Please remove these branches (I may have already mentioned some of them): > > android-3.18-n-release > android-4.4-n > android-4.4-n-release > android-3.18-o-release > android-4.4-o-release > android-4.9-o-release > > > Thanks, > > -Todd > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:04:41 +0100 From: "Mark Brown" Subject: Re: Please add/remove android kernels Message-ID: <20210409180441.GF4436@sirena.org.uk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Groupsio=ApAFve6WYkapbAb0RQH6" List-ID: To: kernelci@groups.io, tkjos@google.com Cc: Kevin Hilman --Groupsio=ApAFve6WYkapbAb0RQH6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:22:33AM -0700, Todd Kjos via groups.io wrote: > Is email still the right way for me to request this sort of thing? Or > should I be self-serving by submitting the proposed changes myself? Email is still fine, but if you want to submit pull requests that'd also be fine - it'd cut out the middleman a bit and reduce the potential for transcription errors I guess. In any case: https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/641 hopefully does everything (some of the removals had already happened). --Groupsio=ApAFve6WYkapbAb0RQH6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmBwlzkACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CSLgf9FQrouM8LMPQvMQ5lcMMEvZWDlSNrfs3vj8zBfv0RcAFT+2Ao/5uXVZpO ttHtVyHSGq0GCL8VOtKdKYX+X184A2rhYYGXmpZ+Dxc7E0MYyc8agmNYSlELbVV0 GTNtI49jWK47vQSqS0YAgM22hQ3vOIGp/OzaXc6p5GYoVTzULcaedS6Q3d0ych5y wiQAoAgwDQQkj4qUznSHSAJvui/uKBR0FSSkdPGt6g/KTTsnSERzMFC3xYO9+HsQ zFa8ttND+OP6gWwzWqn6PGsRijbp73jzy8ZZWHYbNuztwQ6pp5MV2PZaV6BBFw+D MJPIodDmlpt0zc3tolOXZj4Bis2BNw== =r7tW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Groupsio=ApAFve6WYkapbAb0RQH6--