[PATCH 10/10] arm64: versal: Set initrd_high to as high as possible

[Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>]

p? 23. 10. 2020 v 7:44 odes?latel Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> napsal:
>
>
>
> On 22. 10. 20 19:45, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:32:22PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >
> >> From: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu
> >> <siva.durga.paladugu@xilinx.com>
> >>
> >> This patch is setting up the initrd_high to as high as possible
> >> by leaving max stack size for u-boot so that bigger rootfs can
> >> also be loaded by u-boot for booting kernel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu
> >> <siva.durga.paladugu@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
> >> <michal.simek@xilinx.com> ---
> >>
> >> board/xilinx/versal/board.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4
> >> insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/board/xilinx/versal/board.c
> >> b/board/xilinx/versal/board.c index 912c1143a8ad..09229e0a75a4
> >> 100644 --- a/board/xilinx/versal/board.c +++
> >> b/board/xilinx/versal/board.c @@ -217,6 +217,10 @@ int
> >> board_late_init(void)
> >>
> >> env_set("boot_targets", new_targets);
> >>
> >> +    initrd_hi = gd->start_addr_sp - CONFIG_STACK_SIZE; +    initrd_hi
> >> = round_down(initrd_hi, SZ_16M); +   env_set_addr("initrd_high",
> >> (void *)initrd_hi); + return board_late_init_xilinx(); }
> >
> > My concern here (and also microblaze-generic, after some grepping)
> > is that wouldn't it be best to set bootm_size and let fdt and
> > initrd be relocated as needed?
>
> You are right and I have already done it in this way but forget to
> remove this patch from my queue. Will drop this patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal

This patch has been dropped from the series.
1-9 applied.
M


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs