From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id D6935E00867; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:34:12 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.216.196 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.216.196 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-qt0-f196.google.com (mail-qt0-f196.google.com [209.85.216.196]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B174E00655 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt0-f196.google.com with SMTP id n13so27207355qtc.0 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:34:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NTVPyFyl/5KqIMOAHqMx8OiarqQ2dKuUfs8FgzhPnvc=; b=Ei+MAKIY77D5T2agLwMPCsUp66bUCMhDV0m0SN4cL9zB9POeIQ1QjnhDyGudyVchhf 3k1qNmHtme/DK1V4tLOx6RQNkDvNPbKpiC4aX0Z3+VtRnTOzoykhwCrsuLUhswQO1chQ nLebKyVOPfPIFkk9nMpGGnlVMG+XmgfEMW0wN/fTBbbIdxaZwuc04GwGr1HXm6owYloL J8s/GleIFrOWUlyHcqNBlZpnlsYx37wu86MW6oB00PgQAiK6NYGl9X6kIHQw4jWrAY1e vOK/7EYaH2+PGvBKqgvZBsqk3UuDQLXQYODfMAWQlh9m4am5OP2wzHfyClsSquwCXUxr BBMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NTVPyFyl/5KqIMOAHqMx8OiarqQ2dKuUfs8FgzhPnvc=; b=QJayjdVSDJZTuNMYmtk8gRWfIGU4zMP/8g+Sb6v6ReZ4pICMD+200ikOJx97haIxgw mFHOwhQ7jYQ9pSznqNEM82xtux+UGrTYKx8mVhLA0psv81wyARSn3BBAmemQNSJjcPsS FK4w/poNqC5zwkjLkDDbfOQL87lEkLG9QMeTuIuTJKcB9dDIwVXjTS7mgV4FrG5ELPAt G648XBtXQ/qyhIan8H7tDLmXul58/oJmryjEyWwiVcBDQqDHCruXz2eMm2AV2Cu1QSML FvxSZTI4GN4CIdvKHYD6SZ0pcAVLrx22RLO1nHHawiLL03NP+9dHCEmOqQVDND7L67eN bbsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXISCwXi6voV5FfVZ2xtFVpaZf75Js1f8KnAIQO1HgwYhRTzwPyasxcjHpeKmtVp5D66jlGonIdMsHeM9A== X-Received: by 10.200.57.9 with SMTP id s9mr29819329qtb.125.1485282848670; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:34:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.39.252 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:34:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1484820572-11891-1-git-send-email-jacob-chen@iotwrt.com> From: Trevor Woerner Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:34:08 -0500 Message-ID: To: Leon Woestenberg , Romain Perier Cc: Yocto List , Jacob Chen , eddie.cai@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] introduce rockchip offical linux support to meta-rockchip X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:34:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Jacob, Sorry for the delay, I hadn't noticed the patches initially because the tag was missing, then I was busy with other things. I'm taking a look at them now. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Chen wrote: >> >> This series of patches add below features, will add more supports in the >> future(medias, more chips). >> 1 >> Rockchip 4.4 kernel is currently the latest version of the rockchip >> offical kernel, will be an upstream tracking branch. >> We regularly release the kernel through github. It support all rockchip >> 64-bit chips and a few 32-bit chips. >> > The topic mentions "official kernel" and you mention "we". > > Does this mean this is a rock-chips driven effort? > > Good to see such (vendor) support, welcome aboard, but please understand the > "layers" system of Yocto, like the others already pointed out in this email > thread. > > - Basically you create a (BSP) layer, that sits on top of Yocto / > OpenEmbedded core. > - Also, it is good practice to also support the same GIT branch names for > the different Yocto releases (such as krogoth, morty) such that users can > easily match the correct branches so that everything just builds correctly. > > Regards, > > Leon. > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >