From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Crews Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] platform/chrome: Standardize Chrome OS keyboard backlight name Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 12:41:30 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20190404171007.160878-1-ncrews@chromium.org> <20190404171007.160878-3-ncrews@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Guenter Roeck , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Benson Leung , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Jacek Anaszewski , Pavel Machek , Alexandre Belloni , Alessandro Zummo , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Duncan Laurie , Simon Glass List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:36 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:11 AM Nick Crews wrote: > > > > > > We want all backlights for the system keyboard to > > > use a common name, so the name "platform::kbd_backlight" > > > would be better than the current "chromeos::kbd_backlight" > > > name. Normally this wouldn't be worth changing, but the new > > > Wilco keyboard backlight driver uses the "platform" name. > > > We want to make it so all Chrome OS devices are consistent, > > > so we'll change the name here too. > > > > > > > Wondering - who is the "we" you are talking about ? You're right, I should have been more precise. I was referring to Pavel, Enric, and myself. Pavel had this opinion here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/4/1040. I don't know what Pavel meant by "we" in that comment, but I would guess that could mean the other LED maintainers as well? I talked with Enric 1:1 and he didn't see the problem with changing it, though perhaps he was only considering our use of the LED via powerd, and not users in general. I'm guessing Pavel's and Enric's meanings though, excuse me if I am misinterpreting. > > This also has a potential of breaking existing setups if somebody did > happen to match on entire name instead of suffix. Such changes have to > be considered very carefully; at this point I am against of doing > this. Would it make sense to keep the old name as is, and only make the new Wilco name begin with "platform:"? What would you think is best? > > Thanks. > > -- > Dmitry