On 30 December 2013 03:47, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Tushar Behera (2013-12-26 02:18:58)
>> The clocks in S2MPS11 and S5M8767 are managed in the same way, baring
>> a difference in the register offset. It would be better to update
>> existing S2MPS11 driver to support the clocks in S5M8767, rather than
>> creating an almost duplicate driver altogether.
>
> Can you rebase patches #1 & #2 onto clk-next? They do not apply cleanly
> as-is.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>

Commit 1b1ccee1e821 "mfd: s2mps11: Fix build after regmap field rename
in sec-core.c" is also touching this file, which is in Mark's tree
right now. If I rebase
this patch on top clk-next, I am getting conflicts when I merge that
with linux-next.
Let me know how you want to handle this.

I am attaching the rebased patches for your reference.
If you want, I will send them again through git-send-email.

-- 
Tushar Behera